Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40926478›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of public health2025

Genomic data sharing in research across Europe: legal challenges and upcoming opportunities within the European Health Data Space.

Romina Royo, Eva Garcia, Irene Schlünder, Christina Hilmarsen, Mette Kielsholm Thomsen, Emilie Cauët, Simon Kok Jensen, Simona Giardina, Aline Hebrant, Gordana Raicevic Toungouz and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Romina RoyoLife Sciences Department, Barcelona Supercomputing Center, Barcelona, Spain.
Eva GarciaBBMRI-ERIC, Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-3522-5088
Irene SchlünderBBMRI-ERIC, Graz, Austria.
Christina HilmarsenNorwegian Institute of Public Health, Health Data Service, Tynset, Norway.
Mette Kielsholm ThomsenCONNECT-Center for Clinical and Genomic Data, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Central Denmark Region, Denmark.
Emilie CauëtSciensano Cancer Centre, Brussels, Belgium.
Simon Kok JensenCONNECT-Center for Clinical and Genomic Data, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Central Denmark Region, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-0032-131X
Simona GiardinaLife Sciences Department, Barcelona Supercomputing Center, Barcelona, Spain.
Aline HebrantSciensano Cancer Centre, Brussels, Belgium.
Gordana Raicevic ToungouzSciensano Cancer Centre, Brussels, Belgium.
Marc Van Den BulckeSciensano Cancer Centre, Brussels, Belgium.
Juan ArenasELIXIR Hub, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Christian Fynbo ChristiansenCONNECT-Center for Clinical and Genomic Data, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Central Denmark Region, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-0727-953X
Eivind HovigOslo University Hospital, Institute of Cancer Research, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-9103-1077
Petr HolubBBMRI-ERIC, Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-5358-616X
Alfonso ValenciaLife Sciences Department, Barcelona Supercomputing Center, Barcelona, Spain.
Salvador Capella-GutierrezLife Sciences Department, Barcelona Supercomputing Center, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0309-604X

Funding

European Union under the HealthData@EU Pilot 101079839
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The European Health Data Space (EHDS) will help researchers use health data across EU Member States (MS). Currently, cross-border research faces heterogeneous data access processes. Using a real-world use case, this paper analyses challenges and opportunities brought by the upcoming implementation of the EHDS, assessing the situation before and after the regulation comes into force. The use case focused on metastatic colorectal cancer, analysing the relations between mutational signatures and clinical trajectories while addressing data access procedures across MS. The regulatory landscape and the challenges that need to be addressed for the EHDS to enable the secondary use of health data, particularly genomic data, are complex and heterogeneous across MS. We describe the pathway from data application to access to pseudonymized data in secure processing environments, emphasizing the legal requirements, including the role of ethics committees. Finally, we analyse the success factors for achieving access to the data and the reasons for access denial to support shaping the upcoming EHDS implementation. Several challenges remain unaddressed for cross-border data use, especially in the context of genomic data, where the complexity and heterogeneity of informed consent can impact or even impede data-sharing efforts. While EHDS can simplify processes across MS, it is crucial to ensure that additional safeguards do not negatively impact or block access to health data and that EHDS infrastructure is ready for effective and affordable processing of large volumes of genomic and other data.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchGenomicsInformation DisseminationEuropeEuropean UnionHumans

Identifiers

PMID40926478
PMCPMC12420906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.