ArticlePsychophysiology2025
Neural and Cardiac Contributions to Perceptual Suppression During Cycling.
Article in Psychophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Neural and Cardiac Contributions to Perceptual Suppression During Cycling.Psychophysiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Exercise influences visual processing and is accompanied by neural and physiological changes in the body. Yet, the underlying mechanisms by which neural and physiological responses to exercise impact ensuing perception remain poorly understood. In particular, the effects of exercise-induced cardiac changes on visual perception and electrophysiological activity are unclear. Here, we aimed to investigate the relationship between conscious visual perception, neural activity, and cardiac responses during exercise. Thirty healthy participants performed a perceptual suppression task while engaging in light-intensity stationary cycling, with EEG and ECG activity recorded simultaneously. Our study shows that the probability of perceptual suppression decreased during cycling. Parieto-occipital alpha amplitudes (8-12 Hz) also decreased during cycling, but this reduction did not correlate with the decrease in perceptual suppression. Additionally, cycling decreased heartbeat-evoked potential (HEP) amplitudes, indicating altered neural processing of cardiac signals during exercise. However, these exercise-induced changes in HEP amplitudes did not predict perceptual outcomes. Moreover, changes in heart rate in response to cycling did not correlate with changes in perceptual suppression rates, pre-random dot motion stimulus alpha, or HEP amplitudes. These findings indicate that while exercise modulates conscious visual perception, the associated changes in alpha activity, heart rate, and HEPs do not fully explain this effect. Our results highlight the complex relationship between interoceptive processing and mechanisms underlying the perception of external stimuli during exercise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.