Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40926356›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering2025

Multicompartment Darcy Flow Model With Patient-Specific Parameterization: Effect of Heterogeneity and Anisotropy in Porous Parameters.

Namshad Thekkethil, Hao Gao, Nicholas A Hill, Xiaoyu Luo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Namshad ThekkethilSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4939-5002
Hao GaoSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6852-9435
Nicholas A HillSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Xiaoyu LuoSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/S030875/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blood perfusion in cardiac tissues involves intricate interactions among vascular networks and tissue mechanics. Perfusion deficit is one of the leading causes of cardiac diseases, and modeling certain cardiac conditions that are clinically infeasible, invasive, or costly can provide valuable supplementary insights to aid clinicians. However, existing homogeneous perfusion models lack the complexity required for patient-specific simulations. In this study, we develop a computational framework for modeling perfusion using a multicompartment Darcy flow model with heterogeneous anisotropic perfusion that incorporates the nonlinear deformation and compliance of blood vessels with poroelastic parameters derived from realistic vascular data. Through numerical simulations and a comparison of pore pressure results obtained from the proposed model and the Poiseuille flow approach in a benchmark problem, we demonstrate that the heterogeneous anisotropic model outperforms homogeneous models in predicting perfusion, particularly by accurately capturing the spatial heterogeneity of the poroelastic parameters and the permeability transitions from large vessels to microvessels. Additionally, the proposed model successfully simulates patient-specific conditions, such as vessel blockages, highlighting its potential for personalized medical applications.

Indexed as

Models, CardiovascularAnisotropyComputer SimulationHumansPorosityDarcy flowmulticompartment flowmyocardial perfusionporoelasticity

Identifiers

PMID40926356
PMCPMC12420947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.