ArticleBMC global and public health2025
Implementation of a midwifery preceptor program in Sierra Leone: a qualitative evaluation using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.
Article in BMC global and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effectiveness of a novel midwifery preceptor program on midwives' competence and confidence in Sierra Leone: A prospective pilot study.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Key components of developing midwifery preceptors: a pathway to strengthen midwifery education and care in low resource settings.BMC global and public health · 2025Review
- 'We Were Empowered': Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to Examine a Novel Paediatric Nurse Preceptor Programme in Malawi.Nursing open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSierra Leone has the world's third highest incidence of maternal mortality, with 443 deaths per 100,000 live births. Strengthening the country's midwifery workforce is essential to providing adequate maternal healthcare and reducing preventable perinatal mortality. In support of this goal, we developed and implemented a midwifery preceptor program (MPP) to train experienced midwives to effectively mentor new and student midwives. The aim of this study was to qualitatively evaluate barriers and facilitators to the implementation of the MPP using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).
methodsAt the end of the first year of MPP implementation, all preceptors, facilitators, and stakeholders from both implementation sites in Sierra Leone were invited for virtual, individual interviews; 26 participated. Using deductive content analysis, interview transcripts were coded according to the five CFIR domains - innovation, outer setting, inner setting, individuals, and process - and an added sixth domain: future directions. Barriers and facilitators to MPP implementation were assessed per domain.
resultsParticipants identified barriers and facilitators to MPP implementation across all six domains. Facilitators included a well-designed program that comprehensively integrated theory and practice, the support of program facilitators, and effective stakeholder collaborations. Barriers included limited resources and time constraints, which occasionally made it difficult to balance professional responsibilities with program activities. Nonetheless, participants advocated for formalizing the MPP to sustain the program's impact.
conclusionsThe findings indicate that the MPP is a valuable innovation for enhancing midwifery education in Sierra Leone, which in turn can help to improve perinatal health outcomes. By identifying key barriers and facilitators to implementation, this study provides actionable insights to inform the adaptation, scaling, and sustainability of the MPP not only in Sierra Leone but also in other resource-limited settings facing similar workforce challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.