ArticleJournal of intensive care2025
Long-term recovery of sensorimotor functions and prediction of participation in survivors of critical illness: a prospective cohort study.
Article in Journal of intensive care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Neuromusculoskeletal alterations after ACL reconstruction: a cross-sectional study of cortical activity, motor response, and psychological readiness.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSurvivors of critical illness frequently face physical, cognitive and psychological impairments after intensive care. Sensorimotor impairments potentially have a negative impact on participation. However, comprehensive understanding of sensorimotor recovery and participation in survivors of critical illness is limited. Therefore, the aims of this study were to quantify long-term sensorimotor recovery in survivors of critical illness, to examine participation in daily life 1.5 years after illness onset, and to assess the predictive capacity of sensorimotor assessments for future participation.
methodsSurvivors of critical illness who were mechanically ventilated ≥ 5 days on the ICU and who were admitted with weakness to neurorehabilitation were included in this single-center prospective cohort study. Time effects on sensation, muscle strength, balance, walking and dexterity were described at admission to and at discharge from rehabilitation, and 1.5 years after critical illness onset. Participation was assessed with the Reintegration to Normal Living Index. A multiple linear regression with sensorimotor outcomes at rehabilitation admission was conducted to find predictive associations with participation. The model was compared to an extended regression model containing demographic variables and factors known to be associated with participation or quality of life.
resultsAll sensorimotor outcomes among participants (n = 250, median age 63 (54-73) years) improved over time. However, in most patients some deficits remained after rehabilitation and on long-term follow-up. Good participation (≥ 75%) was achieved by 60.2% of survivors 1.5 years after critical illness onset. Concerning participation, the Mini Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest) together with the Box-and-Block-Test, the Five-Times-Sit-to-Stand-Test, and the Medical Research Council score at rehabilitation admission formed a predictive model (R
conclusionsWe observed significant improvements in sensorimotor function, albeit with lingering deficits in sensation, strength, balance, dexterity and participation. Sensorimotor functions at rehabilitation start have limited explanatory power in predicting participation 1.5 years after disease onset. Trial registration German Clinical Trial Register, DRKS00021753. Date of registration: September 03, 2020.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.