Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40926256›Full record

Observational studyBMC oral health2025

Two step approach for detecting and segmenting the second mesiobuccal canal of maxillary first molars on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images via artificial intelligence.

Sally Mansour, Enas Anter, Ali Khater Mohamed, Mushira M Dahaba, Arwa Mousa

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05340140 unknown statusnot on this map

The Accuracy of Computer Aided Detection of Second Mesio-buccal Canal of Maxillary First Molars on CBCT Images Using Deep Learning Model (Artificial Intelligence): Diagnostic Accuracy Study

TypeobservationalSponsorCairo UniversityRan2022 to 2023Enrolled50ConditionsArtificial IntelligenceArmsdeep learning model
NCT07689708 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Diagnostic Accuracy of a Deep Learning Model (Artificial Intelligence) for Detecting Extra Root Canals in Mandibular Premolars on CBCT Images: Diagnostic Accuracy Study.

TypeinterventionalSponsorCairo UniversityRan2026 to 2027Enrolled272ConditionsExtra CanalsArmsAI Model to detect any extra canals in mandibular premolars
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sally MansourOral and Maxillofacial Radiology Department, Cairo university, Cairo, Egypt. sally.mansour@dentistry.cu.edu.eg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-6257-1753
Enas AnterOral and Maxillofacial Radiology Department, Cairo university, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5423-4716
Ali Khater MohamedDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Computer Science, October University for Modern Sciences and Arts (MSA), Giza, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9202-244X
Mushira M DahabaOral and Maxillofacial Radiology Department, Cairo university, Cairo, Egypt.
Arwa MousaOral and Maxillofacial Radiology Department, Cairo university, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8606-8353

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of a customized deep learning model based on CNN and U-Net for detecting and segmenting the second mesiobuccal canal (MB2) of maxillary first molar teeth on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans. METHODOLOGY: CBCT scans of 37 patients were imported into 3D slicer software to crop and segment the canals of the mesiobuccal (MB) root of the maxillary first molar. The annotated data were divided into two groups: 80% for training and validation and 20% for testing. The data were used to train the AI model in 2 separate steps: a classification model based on a customized CNN and a segmentation model based on U-Net. A confusion matrix and receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis were used in the statistical evaluation of the results of the classification model, whereas the Dice-coefficient (DCE) was used to express the segmentation accuracy.

resultsF1 score, testing accuracy, recall and precision values were 0.93, 0.87, 1.0 and 0.87 respectively, for the cropped images of MB root of maxillary 1st molar teeth in the testing group. The testing loss was 0.4, and the area under the curve (AUC) value was 0.57. The segmentation accuracy results were satisfactory, where the DCE of training was 0.85 and DCE of testing was 0.79.

conclusionMB2 in the maxillary first molar can be precisely detected and segmented via the developed AI algorithm in CBCT images.

trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trial Number NCT05340140. April 22, 2022.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCone-Beam Computed TomographyDental Pulp CavityMolarAdultDeep LearningFemaleHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMaleMaxillaArtificial intelligenceCBCTCNNCone beam computed tomographyDeep learningEndodonticsMB2 canalSecond mesiobuccal canal

Identifiers

PMID40926256
PMCPMC12418648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.