Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40926243›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2025

Optimising the educational utility of live tissue training in trauma surgery.

Cara Swain, Hugo Cohen, Jennifer Routh, Gert Helgesson, Rory Rickard, Klas Karlgren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cara SwainDepartment of Learning, Informatics, Management & Ethics (LIME) Widerströmska huset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. cara.swain@ki.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0273-9653
Hugo CohenAcademic Department of Military Surgery & Trauma, Royal Centre for Defence Medicine (RCDM), Birmingham, UK.
Jennifer RouthSchool of Veterinary Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
Gert HelgessonDepartment of Learning, Informatics, Management & Ethics (LIME) Widerströmska huset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Rory RickardAcademic Department of Military Surgery & Trauma, Royal Centre for Defence Medicine (RCDM), Birmingham, UK.
Klas KarlgrenDepartment of Learning, Informatics, Management & Ethics (LIME) Widerströmska huset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLive tissue training (LTT) refers to the use of live anaesthetised animals for the purpose of medical education. It is a type of simulation training that is contentious, and there is an ethical imperative for educators to justify the use of animals. This should include scrutinising educational practices. The authors' aim was to explore learners' and educators' experiences of LTT for surgical learning, employing simulation theory to analyse how LTT can be optimised as a simulated learning event.

methodsThis study used semi-structured interviews to generate data from fifteen physicians who had participated in LTT as learners or educators. The data were thematically analysed using the Framework Method.

findingsSuggestions on how LTT could be optimised were discussed by the participants across three themes: Planning, Delivering, and Experiencing LTT. The Planning theme provides context into what specific learning aims LTT should be used for, and whom this type of learning would benefit. The Delivering theme centred around the idea of delivering the curriculum content using various pedagogic methods and framing the animal as a patient rather than a model. The Experiencing theme describes the learner's experience of clinical reality and the importance of real-life survival of the animal during training.

conclusionThese themes along with simulation theory have been used to create a series of recommendations about how LTT could be optimised to ensure educational quality. Key recommendations include clarifying which learners should attend, restructuring courses to include a brief and debrief, teaching technical and non-technical skills in tandem, and focusing learning on the animal as a patient, in order to promote a realistic experience.

Indexed as

Simulation TrainingTraumatologyAcute Care SurgeryAnimalsClinical CompetenceCurriculumHumansInterviews as TopicQualitative ResearchEducationLive animal trainingSimulationSurgery

Identifiers

PMID40926243
PMCPMC12421745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.