Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40926239›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England)2025

Pre-employment urine drug screening: examining trends in THC-COOH positivity rates post-legalization of recreational cannabis in California - a retrospective review.

Akbar Sharip, Roshan Razavi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Akbar SharipOccupational and Environmental Medicine, Department of Preventive Medicine, Loma Linda University, 24785 Stewart Street, Evans Hall, Suite 204, Loma Linda, CA, 92354, USA. asharip@llu.edu.
Roshan RazaviOccupational Medicine, Antioch Medical Center, Kaiser Permanente, 4501 Sand Creek Road, Antioch, CA, 94531, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study examines trends in delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol-9-carboxylic acid (THC-COOH) positivity rates in pre-employment urine drug screenings at a single university-based hospital occupational medicine clinic from 2017 to 2022, following California's recreational cannabis legalization in 2016, with sales beginning officially on January 1, 2018.

methodsRetrospective analysis of 21,546 de-identified urine drug screenings from 2017 to 2022 was conducted. Initial screening used instant urine drug immunoassays (50 ng/mL cutoff for THC-COOH), followed by confirmatory gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (15 ng/mL cutoff). Positivity rates were calculated annually, and descriptive statistics summarized age and gender distributions among positive cases. The Cochran-Armitage trend test assessed temporal trends.

resultsOf 21,546 screenings, 92 (0.44%) were THC-COOH-positive. The positivity rate increased from 0.12% (4/3,215) in 2017 to 0.94% (45/4,784) in 2022 (Cochran-Armitage, Z = 5.19, p < 0.001), a 683.33% relative increase (absolute change: 0.82%). Among positive cases, 76% were aged 20-39 (mean: 29.00 years, SD = 9.5), and the female proportion rose from 25.00 to 62.22%. Median THC-COOH levels ranged from 60.00 to 176.50 ng/mL (overall: 145.0, IQR: 309.5).

conclusionTHC-COOH positivity rates increased significantly post-legalization, potentially influenced by increased cannabis use. Urine tests detect past use, not impairment, highlighting the need for impairment-focused testing per Assembly Bill 2188 (2024). Missing total sample demographic data limit age/gender subgroup analyses.

Indexed as

CannabisDrug screeningOccupational medicineRecreational cannabis legalizationTHC-COOH

Identifiers

PMID40926239
PMCPMC12418667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.