ArticleBMC public health2025
Beyond the screen: exploring digital health experiences of individuals affected by psoriasis - a qualitative interview study.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [SmartRegioDerm: a teledermatological care approach with whole body scanners in rural areas of Bavaria].Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPsoriasis, a chronic inflammatory skin disorder, imposes a high burden on those affected, often leading to stigma and increased depression risk. With the increasing importance of digital media in medical contexts, there is a notable prevalence of misinformation and low-quality content. This study aims to explore the experiences of individuals affected by psoriasis regarding their disease-related digital media use.
methodsSemi-structured interviews with open-ended questions were conducted with psoriasis-affected people between August 2020 and January 2022 in Germany. The participants were recruited through digital media platforms, professional contacts, and in person at a university hospital department in southern Germany and were interviewed via video call. The recorded data was pseudonymized, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using qualitative content analysis by Mayring which also allowed a quantitative evaluation of the category placements.
resultsEight participants (50% female) with a median age of 40.5 years (range: 25-80 years) were included. Four main categories emerged: (1) strengths and (2) difficulties of digital media in the context of psoriasis, (3) digital media in the context of the physician-patient relationship, and (4) suggestions for improvement. Commonly mentioned strengths were the positive impact on one's well-being and the access to alternative therapy options. Frequently named problems were qualitative shortcomings and commercial interests. Most participants reported that digital media was not addressed in the physician-patient communication. Nevertheless, instances where it was discussed revealed predominantly negative reactions from physicians. Participants desired an increased availability of online resources and enhanced cooperation between digital media platforms and physicians.
conclusionsThis study underscores the opportunities and challenges presented by digital media in managing psoriasis. Physicians should ensure that their patients access reliable platforms. Collaboration between physicians and affected individuals on digital media and adapting the traditional physician-patient relationship to an increasingly digitalized world are suggested to enhance patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.