Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40926216›Full record

ArticleBMC emergency medicine2025

Difficult calls to emergency medical dispatch centres - a mixed method study.

Inger K Holmström, Hans Blomberg, Ulrika Winblad, Douglas Spangler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Inger K HolmströmSchool of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Mälardalen University, Postbox 883, Västerås, SE-72123, Sweden. inger.holmstrom@mdu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4302-5529
Hans BlombergUppsala Center for Prehospital Research, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Ulrika WinbladDepartment of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Douglas SpanglerDepartment of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAt emergency medical dispatch centres (EMDCs) telephone triage takes place in three steps: identifying the event, assessing the caller’s need for support, and prioritizing the response. Some calls are considered to be more difficult to handle than others, and decision support systems may in these situations be of limited help. The aim of this study was to describe and characterize difficult calls to EMDCs.

methodsRetrospective call data from 2022 to 2023 was extracted for Registered Nurse (RN) dispatchers at three EMDCs in Sweden agreeing to participate in this mixed-method study. Categories of difficult calls were identified based on prior research and operationalized as key-word searches in the free text call notes or as indicators based on structured data. A purposeful selection of calls meeting these criteria were extracted, anonymized, and data regarding categories and the phase on the call in which they occurred then coded. A descriptive quantitative analysis was performed, and logistic regression was used to estimate the association between demographics and the likelihood of high-priority ambulance dispatch.

resultsOver the two-year study period, 14 included RNs handled 27,805 calls. Of these, 4888 calls (17.6%) were identified as potentially difficult calls based on free-text notes and structured data, from which 123 calls were selected for further analysis. The median age of callers were 49 years, and 49% were female. Median call duration was 5.6 min, compared to 5.1 min in the full dataset, and 39.5% of calls resulted in a lights and sirens response. Vague or unclear symptoms and psychiatric problems were the most common difficulties. These could occur in all three phases of the calls and in several of the phases in one single call, with a combination of “assessing and prioritizing” being the most common. Male sex was found to be associated with a higher likelihood of receiving an ambulance with high priority.

conclusionsDifficult calls, mainly with vague or unclear symptoms and psychiatric problems, are common at EMDCs. The reason for the tendency to prioritize young males higher are seen in other contexts but not in truly high priority cases at dispatch and needs further investigation.

Indexed as

Emergency Medical DispatchEmergency Medical Service Communication SystemsTriageFemaleHumansRetrospective StudiesSwedenTelephoneAuthentic callsDifficult callsEmergency medical dispatch centresEMSTelephone nursingTelephone triage

Identifiers

PMID40926216
PMCPMC12418652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.