ArticleSurgical endoscopy2025
Evaluating the ergonomic aspects of laparoscopic energy devices: combination of a survey and a kinesiologic experiment.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThis study aimed to evaluate surgeons' ergonomic satisfaction when using laparoscopic energy devices and to investigate how prolonged use affects muscle fatigue and surgical performance.
methodsA two-part study, including a survey and a kinesiologic experiment, was conducted to compare 4 laparoscopic energy devices (D1-D4). Thirty surgeons completed a structured survey assessing ergonomic factors such as device weight, grip strength, handle design, comfort, and trigger location. In parallel, a kinesiologic experiment involving 20 surgeons measured device activation force, surface electromyography (EMG) changes, and targeting accuracy before and after fatigue induction using a standardized protocol.
resultsThe survey revealed significant ergonomic differences among devices. In the kinesiologic study, two devices showed a significant decline in precision and targeting accuracy after fatigue. All but one device demonstrated significant changes in the median frequency (MDF) and integrated EMG (iEMG) of the flexor digitorum superficialis muscle (P < 0.001), indicating muscle fatigue.
conclusionProlonged use of certain laparoscopic energy devices induces muscle fatigue and impairs accuracy. These findings underscore the importance of ergonomic considerations in surgical instrument design to enhance surgeon performance and reduce fatigue-related risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.