SynthesisJournal of robotic surgery2025
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the learning curve and mentoring in robotic pancreatectomy: transitioning from novice to expert robotic surgeon.
Synthesis in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Robotic curriculum and development strategies in robotic abdominal surgery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Article
- The Hidden Cost of Precision: Financial, Training, and Environmental Trade-Offs in Robotic HPB Surgery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The adoption of robotic pancreatectomy has grown significantly in recent years, driven by its potential advantages in precision, minimally invasive access, and improved patient recovery. However, mastering these complex procedures requires overcoming a substantial learning curve, and the role of structured mentoring in facilitating this transition remains underexplored. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the number of cases required to achieve surgical proficiency, assess the impact of mentoring on skill acquisition, and analyze how outcomes evolve throughout the learning process. Following PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a thorough literature search across PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, encompassing studies published from the inception of robotic pancreatic surgery up to 2025. We included studies that explicitly reported on learning curves, mentoring interventions, or skill progression in robotic pancreatic resections. Meta-analytical methods were employed to synthesize data on operative time, intraoperative blood loss, conversion rates, and postoperative complications. After screening 1,234 records, 25 studies met our inclusion criteria. Our findings indicate that achieving proficiency in robotic distal pancreatectomy typically requires 20-30 cases, with operative time stabilizing around 180 min beyond this threshold. In contrast, robotic pancreatoduodenectomy, being more technically demanding, necessitated 40-60 cases before surgeons reached consistent performance levels. Notably, surgeons who underwent formal mentoring programs demonstrated a shortened learning curve, requiring approximately 10-15 fewer cases to achieve comparable outcomes. Furthermore, mentored surgeons exhibited significantly lower complication rates (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.45-0.85) and reduced operative times (mean difference - 45 min, 95% CI - 60 to - 30).These results underscore the importance of structured training and mentorship in robotic pancreatic surgery. The integration of standardized learning pathways, simulation-based training, and proctored early cases may optimize skill acquisition and improve patient outcomes. Future research should focus on defining universal benchmarks for proficiency and evaluating long-term benefits of mentorship programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40926144What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.