ArticleOral and maxillofacial surgery2025
Enhancing submandibular gland resection: A retrospective study on the efficacy of the ORBEYE 3D exoscope.
Article in Oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Improved usability of an active-polarized 3D display in exoscopic surgery under non-optimal viewing conditions.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeFor submandibular gland resection, conventional surgery with the naked eye remains the standard. With its excellent automatic focus and high magnification, the ORBEYE 3D exoscope enables precise submandibular gland resection with less stress. Therefore, we aimed to examine the usefulness of the exoscope in submandibular gland resection.
methodsThis retrospective study involved 12 patients who underwent submandibular gland resection with the ORBEYE exoscope at the Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Otorhinolaryngology at Kansai Medical University from April 2021 to March 2024. Surgical outcomes were retrospectively reviewed.
resultsThe mean age of the patients (six women and six men) was 58.5 (23-83) years. The final histopathology showed pleomorphic adenoma in eight patients, non-sebaceous-type lymphadenoma and carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma in one patient each, and sialolithiasis with chronic inflammation in two patients. We performed facial artery and vein sparing in all patients except one, in whom level I neck dissection, including submandibular gland excision, was performed. We identified the marginal mandibular branches of the facial, hypoglossal, and lingual nerves, as well as the submandibular duct in all patients. There were no postoperative complications in any of the patients. The mean operative time was 104 (80-129) min. The mean blood volume lost was 20 (5-43) mL.
conclusionUsing the ORBEYE exoscope in submandibular gland resection will contribute to preserving the mandibular marginal branch of the facial and lingual nerves and facial and artery veins, and visualizing the submandibular ducts, which are important structures surrounding the submandibular gland.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.