SynthesisUpdates in surgery2026
Pancreatic anastomosis in minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review of detailed techniques.
Synthesis in Updates in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy is gaining success among surgeons also for the increasing use of robotic approach. Ideal candidates are patients with small, confined tumor and dilatated Wirsung duct which is a quite rare clinical conditions: in fact, most of minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomies are performed for periampullary cancer, easy to remove but with soft pancreatic remnant and tiny Wirsung duct. The result is the technical challenge of the pancreatico-enteric reconstructions. Moreover, most authors reported quite acceptable rate of clinically relevant post-operative pancreatic fistula after these complex procedures without detailed description of their reconstruction techniques. A systematic search of the literature was performed identifying relevant articles between 2012 and July 2023 about minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy. The inclusion criteria were studies giving a detailed description (including iconography) of the pancreatic anastomosis during laparoscopic or robotic pancreatoduodenectomy. The aim of this review is to focus on the technical aspects of pancreatico-enteric reconstruction, considering only those studies reporting detailed description of the anastomosis with clear illustrations with the intent to allow to readers to successfully reproduce the technique. Among all reported studies, the double layer pancreaticojejunostomy with duct-to-mucosa, in association with duct stenting, is the preferred anastomosis. According with this review the double layer pancreaticojejunostomy with duct-to-mucosa is the preferred anastomosis during minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy. Other RCT should be advocated to reach strong evidence for a uniformly adopted reconstruction method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40926066What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.