Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40925804›Full record

ArticleInternational psychogeriatrics2026

Barriers and facilitators to usability of a smartphone-based digital mental health tool in older adults: Insights from a secondary analysis of mindLAMP.

Elombe Calvert, Katherine Hackett, John Torous, Tania Giovannetti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International psychogeriatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elombe CalvertDepartment of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States. Electronic address: ecalvert@bidmc.harvard.edu.
Katherine HackettDepartment of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States. Electronic address: Katherine.Hackett@mountsinai.org.
John TorousDepartment of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States. Electronic address: jtorous@bidmc.harvard.edu.
Tania GiovannettiDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, United States. Electronic address: tania.giovannetti@temple.edu.

Funding

Research Training for the Care of Vulnerable Older Adults with Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias and Other Chronic ConditionsT32AG066598 · NIA · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI Alex D Federman · 2020 to 2026
$2.3M
Assessing Everyday Function in Older Adults with the Virtual KitchenR01AG062503 · NIA · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI GIOVANNETTI, TANIA · 2020 to 2024
$1.8M
Improving Everyday Task Performance through Repeated Practice in Virtual RealityR21AG066771 · NIA · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI GIOVANNETTI, TANIA · 2020 to 2021
$438k
Validation of Smartphone-Derived Digital Phenotypes for Cognitive Assessment in Older AdultsF31AG069444 · NIA · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI HACKETT, KATHERINE · 2020 to 2022
$66k
NIA NIH HHS F31 AG069444NIA NIH HHS R01 AG062503NIA NIH HHS R21 AG066771NIA NIH HHS T32 AG066598
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs demand for mental healthcare access grows among older adult populations, digital mental health tools have emerged as promising tools. However, bridging the digital divide among older technology users remains critical. This post-hoc analysis evaluated potential factors influencing the adoption of a digital mental health tool in older adults.

methodsWe analyzed data from 37 older adults who used a digital phenotyping app (mindLAMP) for 4 weeks to capture passive sensor data and complete nightly surveys. We examined associations between baseline participant features including demographics, cognition, mood, technology attitudes and use, and usability outcomes including app training metrics, adherence, and self-reported usability.

resultsParticipants had a mean age of 72, with most identifying as female (68 %), college educated (76 %), retired (81 %), and White (59 %). The app demonstrated high usability, with baseline training averaging 20.2 (±6.5) minutes and 80 % nightly survey completion. At study completion, 30/37 participants reported finding the app easy to use. While not significant after correction, female sex, Black race, and some college education emerged as potentially promising factors associated with better usability outcomes. DISCUSSION: These findings suggest that with modest training, older adults can engage with digital health tools and report positive usability experiences. Differences in usability outcomes by sex, race, and education point to potential characteristics that may influence engagement. However, given the small, highly educated sample, these findings should be replicated in larger, more diverse cohorts to better understand which factors support the successful use of digital health tools in older adults.

Indexed as

Mental HealthMobile ApplicationsSmartphoneAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTelemedicineAccess to careDigital divideDigital literacyDigital mental health interventionsMental health apps

Identifiers

PMID40925804
PMCPMC13142898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.