Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40925711›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2025

Socioeconomic diversity of doctors in the United Kingdom: a cross-sectional study of 10 years of Labour Force Survey social mobility data.

Nathan J Cheetham, Fleur Cantle, Andy Guise, Claire J Steves

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nathan J CheethamDepartment of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King's College London, London, UK nathan.cheetham@kcl.ac.uk claire.j.steves@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2259-1556
Fleur CantleDepartment of Emergency Medicine, King's College Hospital, London, UK.
Andy GuiseDepartment of Population Health Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0981-4663
Claire J StevesDepartment of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King's College London, London, UK nathan.cheetham@kcl.ac.uk claire.j.steves@kcl.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo estimate the association between socioeconomic background (derived from household main earner occupation when the survey respondent was aged 14 years old) and likelihood of working as a doctor in adulthood in the UK, and estimate how associations varied over time for respondents who turned 18 years old in different decades.

designObservational study of 10 years of pooled data from a nationally representative government survey.

settingThe United Kingdom (UK).

participants358 934 respondents to the UK Office for National Statistics Labour Force Survey between July 2014 and September 2023. Respondents aged 22 years old or below or retired respondents aged 65 years old and above were excluded.

main outcome measuresWhether the respondent was currently working as a medical practitioner (doctor).

results2772 respondents were currently working as doctors (0.8% of respondents). 13% of doctors were from working-class backgrounds (National Statistics Socio-economic Classification 5-8), compared with 43% of non-doctor respondents, while 69% of doctors came from professional backgrounds (vs 32% of non-doctors) (unadjusted proportions). From multivariable Poisson regression models adjusting for year of survey, the year the respondent turned 18, sex, country of birth and ethnic group, the likelihood of being a doctor varied largely according to socioeconomic background, with those from professional backgrounds 3 times and 6 times more likely to become doctors than those from intermediate backgrounds and working class backgrounds, respectively (average predicted probability: 1.6% vs 0.5% vs 0.3%). Respondents growing up in households where the main earner was a doctor were by far the most likely to themselves report working as a doctor (average predicted probability: 10.1%), 15-fold more likely than all respondents with non-doctor backgrounds (risk ratio=15.0, 95% CIs 13.4 to 16.7), and between 3 times and 100 times more likely when compared with other specific occupation groups. Stratified analyses suggested socioeconomic inequalities were highly stable over time among respondents who turned 18 between the 1960s and the 2000s, and then weak evidence of decreasing diversity from 2010 to 2018.

conclusionsThere are large, persistent and potentially widening inequalities in the socioeconomic background of doctors working in the UK between 2014 and 2023, leading to doctors being highly socioeconomically unrepresentative of the general UK population. New data collections on the socioeconomic background of working doctors are needed to monitor this inequality and understand its effects on patient care. Increased and/or alternative efforts may be needed to address this entrenched inequality and improve social mobility into medicine.

Indexed as

EmploymentPhysiciansSocial MobilityAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSocial ClassSocioeconomic FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited KingdomYoung AdultHealth ServicesHealth WorkforceMEDICAL EDUCATION & TRAINING

Identifiers

PMID40925711
PMCPMC12421607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.