ArticleAnesthesia progress2025
Comparison of the Length and Shape of Various Preformed Nasotracheal Tubes.
Article in Anesthesia progress, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: We aimed to investigate the differences in the lengths and shapes of several preformed nasotracheal tubes (NTTs) among different manufacturers and compare our findings with a previous report. Methods: Using reference points at the tube tip, the proximal edge of the cuff, and the flexion point, we measured tube lengths for NTTs with inner diameters of 6.5, 7.0, and 7.5 mm from 4 manufacturers: the Parker Preformed Cuffed Endotracheal Tube (Parker), the Medtronic Taper Guard RAE (RAE), the Rusch AGT Nasal Preformed Cuffed Endotracheal Tube, and the Portex Polar Preformed Tracheal Tube. Cuff lengths and shapes were also assessed. A historical comparison was then performed using a previous report from 2012. Results: The effective lengths (distance between tube tip and flexion point) were largest for the Parker tubes (295-315 mm). The RAE and Rusch tubes had the shortest effective lengths (270-290 mm). Cuff lengths ranged from 30 to 39 mm, and cuff shapes were cylindrical, tapered, and oval. Comparison with the past data revealed substantial changes in tube lengths for Parker and RAE tubes, modest increases in cuff lengths, and a change in cuff shape from oval to tapered in RAE tubes. Conclusion: Several changes in tube lengths and cuff lengths/shapes were noted among manufacturers relative to the historical data. These findings demonstrate that manufacturer specifications can change over time. In dentistry and oral surgery, Parker tubes may be more ideal due to their longer effective lengths because extension and/or rotation of the neck can decrease NTT insertion depth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.