ArticleAnesthesia progress2025
Immunohistochemical Analysis of Maxillary Nerve Distribution in Rats.
Article in Anesthesia progress, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Previous studies of nerve distribution in the orofacial complex have focused primarily on the anatomic courses of nerve fibers and have rarely addressed the density of nerve distribution. The nerve distribution in the mandible was described in only one report which showed an increase in nerve distribution density moving from the alveolar crest toward the inferior alveolar nerve. However, no previous reports have focused on the nerve distribution density in the maxilla. Methods: In this study involving 6 Wistar rats, tissue samples from the maxillary molar region were obtained and sectioned for staining and analysis. All nerves including nociceptive nerves in 5 regions of the maxilla samples, ranging from the alveolar crest to the superior alveolar nerve, were immunohistochemically stained with antibodies to protein gene product (PGP) and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) to identify and measure the vertical and horizontal nerve distribution densities in the 5 regions under an optical microscope. We also determined the ratio of nociceptive (CGRP-positive) nerves to all (PGP-positive) nerves. Results: The densities of both PGP- and CGRP-positive nerves increased vertically from the alveolar crest to the superior alveolar nerve and horizontally from the periosteal side to the periodontal ligament side within the maxilla. The ratio of CGRP- to PGP-positive nerves was on average greater than 80%. Conclusion: These findings were consistent with those of the previous report on mandibular nerve distribution. However, our results suggest that the overall nerve distribution density in the maxilla is approximately one-third of that in the mandible. The results of this study, which report the nerve distribution density in the posterior maxilla, may support future research on pain and local anesthesia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.