Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40925594›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of public health2025

Smoking at football clubs: the Netherlands compared to Germany.

Anton E Kunst, Rixt A Smit, Emma S E Schlotz, Julia Keijzer, Andrea D Rozema, Mirte A G Kuipers

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anton E KunstDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3313-5273
Rixt A SmitDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1645-0562
Emma S E SchlotzDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Julia KeijzerDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Andrea D RozemaTranzo Scientific Center for Care and Wellbeing, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7556-2409
Mirte A G KuipersDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ideally, in a smoke-free generation, children could practice sports in a smoke-free setting. This article studied the prevalence of smoking at football clubs in two countries. An audit at 45 German and 116 Dutch clubs measured smoking prevalence at three places. In the Netherlands, smoking was less common at playing fields (at 25% of Dutch clubs versus 64% of German clubs), but more common at terraces (44 versus 19%) and entrances (20 versus 11%). Despite more comprehensive anti-tobacco policies, smoking at clubs in The Netherlands was as common as in Germany, possibly due to displacement of smoking from fields towards other places.

Indexed as

FootballSmokingSoccerTobacco Smoke PollutionChildGermanyHumansMaleNetherlandsPrevalenceSmoke-Free PolicyTobacco Smoke Pollution

Identifiers

PMID40925594
PMCPMC12529257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.