ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2025
Crowding reduces per-capita parasite infection risk in a butterfly host.
Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Crowding reduces per-capita parasite infection risk in a butterfly host.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Crowding can result in greater disease transmission, yet crowded hosts may also remove infectious propagules from the environment, thereby lowering the encounter rate and infectious dose received by conspecifics. We combined experimental and modelling work to examine the impact of crowding of butterfly larvae on the per-capita risk of infection by a protozoan that is transmitted via the larval food plant, and the resulting infection load in adult butterflies. We reared larvae at different densities and exposed them to low and high doses of parasites. We modified an existing model to include effects of conspecific density on food (and thus parasite) consumption rate and infected adult mortality rate. Experimental work indicated that the proportion of infected hosts on plants with ten caterpillars were reduced by at least 50% compared with single caterpillars. High density reduced per-capita infection risk and parasite load and extended lifespan of all hosts, as crowded hosts removed parasites from the environment. Modelling suggested that the lower consumption rate due to crowding can lower infection prevalence by as much as 20%, although the number of new cases increases with larger population size. Our results highlight that the expected positive relationship between host density and infection prevalence breaks down when crowding results in removal of infectious propagules from the environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.