Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40925554›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2025

Biomechanical components of the plant-insect herbivore arms race: a model test in leaf-cutter ants.

Olivia K Walthaus, Dilanka I Deegala, Raphael Delattre, David Labonte

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Olivia K WalthausDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0009-0000-9243-7856
Dilanka I DeegalaDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0009-0008-9273-0444
Raphael DelattreDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.
David LabonteDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1952-8732

Funding

H2020 European Research CouncilHuman Frontier Science Program
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insects and plants have been locked in an evolutionary arms race spanning 350 million years. Insects evolved specialized tools to cut into plant tissue, and plants, to counter these attacks, developed diverse defence strategies. Much previous worked has focused on chemical defences. How can plants vary their mechanical properties to deter herbivores, and how can insects respond? We test a simple mechanical model that relates the force required to cut thin, leaf-like tissues to their mechanical properties and the geometry of the cutting tool. To remove the confounding effects of tool shape across size, we use leaf-cutter ant mandibles as a model system. Cutting forces were measured for pristine and worn mandibles that vary by one order of magnitude in size, using a custom-built fibre-optic set-up and homogeneous pseudoleaves as well as a set of plant tissues as model substrates. The results substantially support the model, enabling quantitative predictions. Fracture toughness is identified as a key mechanical defence trait for plants, cutting edge radius as the critical geometric property of the insect mandible and cutting edge wear consequently emerges as a key modulator of cutting forces, elevating it up to fivefold above a physical minimum. Thus, plants may be served by implementing strategies that maximize wear, whereas insects should seek to minimize it.

Indexed as

AntsHerbivoryModels, BiologicalPlant LeavesAnimalsBiomechanical Phenomenacuttingfractureinsect herbivoryplant mechanical defences

Identifiers

PMID40925554
PMCPMC12419890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.