Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40925341›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of international medical research2025

Evaluation of the effect of autophagy on pseudoexfoliation syndrome.

Nazlı Can, Göksu Alaçamlı, Aylin Karalezli, Nermin Başsimitci

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of international medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nazlı CanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Mugla Sıtkı Koçman University, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-2023-8246
Göksu AlaçamlıDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Mugla University, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-5013-9981
Aylin KaralezliKarelezli Private Ophthalmology Clinic, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-1316-4656
Nermin BaşsimitciMedicine Faculty, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ObjectivePseudoexfoliation syndrome is a systemic disease of unknown etiology, seen in advanced ages, characterized by extracellular material accumulation in ocular tissues and visceral organs. Autophagy, which is a basic metabolic pathway, provides macromolecule recycling of the cell and maintains cell homeostasis by adapting to the cell's stress environment. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between specific mechanisms of autophagy and pseudoexfoliation syndrome.MethodsIn this prospective-controlled study, anterior capsulorhexis materials obtained during cataract surgery were immunohistochemically compared between eyes with and without pseudoexfoliation syndrome using Image Tool Software for possible changes in autophagy, in terms of expression levels of Beclin 1, ATG5, ATG6, ATG12, p62, and LC3A/B autophagy markers.ResultsSignificant differences were observed between the anterior capsulorhexis materials of eyes with and without pseudoexfoliation syndrome, in terms of expression levels of some specific autophagy markers.ConclusionOur study may gain importance as it is the first study in which Beclin 1, ATG5, ATG6, ATG12, p62, and LC3A/B autophagy markers are examined prospectively in the etiopathogenesis of pseudoexfoliation syndrome, comprehensively and with a control group.

Indexed as

AutophagyExfoliation SyndromeAgedAged, 80 and overAutophagy-Related ProteinsBeclin-1BiomarkersCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsMiddle AgedProspective StudiesAutophagy-Related ProteinsBeclin-1BECN1 protein, humanBiomarkersMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsautophagyimmunohistochemistyPseudoexfoliation syndrome

Identifiers

PMID40925341
PMCPMC12421009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.