ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2025
Giant splenic hemangioma during pregnancy: a case report.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and importanceGiant splenic hemangiomas are rare and pose diagnostic and management challenges, particularly during pregnancy. This case highlights the need for multidisciplinary approach to manage such a massive splenic lesion in the second trimester. CASE PRESENTATION: A 34-year-old woman with pre-pregnancy splenic cysts developed left upper quadrant distension at 19 weeks of gestation. Physical examination and preoperative ultrasound confirmed splenic enlargement. Due to concerns for splenic rupture from uterine compression, open splenectomy was performed at 19 weeks + 5 days. Histopathology analysis confirmed splenic hemangioma. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Management of splenic hemangioma or other types of massive splenic mass lacks standardized guideline. And imaging alone cannot reliably differentiate type of splenic lesions. In pregnant patients, management should be individualized based on lesion size, symptoms, gestational age, and complication risk of conservative approaches. Treatment options necessitate multidisciplinary collaboration to balance maternal-fetal safety.
conclusionThis case of giant splenic hemangioma during pregnancy demonstrates that splenectomy in the second trimester is feasible after balancing balance maternal-fetal risks. It emphasizes the necessity of multidisciplinary decision-making to optimize maternal and fetal outcomes in management of complex abdominal masses during pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.