Trial reportNeurology2025
Long-Term Open-Label Study Evaluating Oral Miglustat Treatment in Patients With Neuronal Ceroid Lipofuscinosis Type 3.
Trial report in Neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Miglustat in Neuronopathic Lysosomal Storage Disorders: Biological Rationale, Clinical Evidence, and Limits of Repurposing.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Genetic Diagnosis in Epilepsy: Implications for Clinical Management.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2026Review
- Off-Target Binding of Miglustat to Glycogen Debranching Enzyme.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- A Flupirtine Benzyl Carbamate Improves Neurocognitive Deficits and Molecular Pathology in theCells · 2026Article
- Longitudinal Exploration of Auditory Sensory-Perceptual Processing in CLN3 Disease (Juvenile Neuronal Ceroid Lipofuscinosis (Batten disease)): A High-Density Auditory Evoked Potential (AEP) Study.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesNeuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis type 3 (CLN3) is a rare lysosomal storage disorder characterized by progressive neurodegeneration. No disease-modifying treatments are currently available. Miglustat, a substrate reduction therapy, has shown preclinical efficacy in CLN3 models (conference abstract). The aim of this study was to assess the long-term safety and clinical impact of miglustat in patients with CLN3 disease.
methodsThis was an open-label, single-center study conducted at Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital in Rome, Italy. Oral miglustat was titrated to 15 mg/kg/d or a maximum of 600 mg/d. Patients were assessed every 6 months using the Unified Batten Disease Rating Scale (UBDRS). The primary outcome was the annual rate of change in the UBDRS physical subscale. Clinical data were analyzed descriptively.
resultsSix patients (33% female) with a median age of 20.34 years (interquartile range [IQR] 18.25-23.84) were treated and followed for a median of 3.9 years (IQR 3.32-4.34). The mean annual change in the UBDRS physical score was +1.96 points per year (SD ± 0.80). Miglustat was well tolerated, with only mild, self-limiting gastrointestinal side effects observed. DISCUSSION: Miglustat showed a favorable safety profile and was associated with a slower rate of physical decline compared with historical controls. Limitations include small sample size, genetic heterogeneity, and open-label design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.