Trial reportBlood advances2025
Outcomes after transition from ibrutinib to zanubrutinib in patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia from the ASPEN study.
Trial report in Blood advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 3, Randomized, Open-Label, Multicenter Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of the Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Inhibitors BGB-3111 and Ibrutinib in Subjects With Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia (WM)
An Open-label, Multi-center, Long-term Extension Study of Zanubrutinib (BGB-3111) Regimens in Patients With B-cell Malignancies
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical improvement of pemphigus-like mucocutaneous disease in a patient with CLL following initiation of zanubrutinib: a case report.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractZanubrutinib is a next-generation covalent Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor designed to provide complete and sustained BTK occupancy for efficacy across disease-relevant tissues, with fewer off-target effects than other covalent BTK inhibitors. In the phase 3 ASPEN study (BGB-3111-302), comparable efficacy and a favorable safety profile vs ibrutinib were demonstrated in patients with MYD88 (myeloid differentiation primary response 88)-mutated Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM), leading to approval of zanubrutinib for patients with WM. BGB-3111-LTE1 (LTE1) is a long-term extension study to which eligible patients, including patients from comparator treatment arms, could enroll after participation in various parent studies of zanubrutinib to treat B-cell malignancies. Here, safety and efficacy are reported in the 47 patients who transitioned from ibrutinib treatment in ASPEN to zanubrutinib in LTE1. The median time from ibrutinib treatment initiation to LTE1 enrollment was 50.4 months (range, 26-59.3). At median LTE1 study follow-up of 15.3 months (range, 6.0-35.1), 85% of patients in this subgroup remained on zanubrutinib treatment. The median zanubrutinib treatment duration was 15.3 months. Despite advanced and increasing patient age, most ibrutinib treatment-emergent adverse events of interest for BTK inhibitors did not recur or worsen with zanubrutinib. WM disease response was maintained or improved in 44 of 46 efficacy-evaluable patients (96%; n = 2 converted to negative immunofixation). Although limited by sample size and nonrandomized/ad hoc analyses, data suggest that patients who tolerate ibrutinib may switch to zanubrutinib without compromising safety or efficacy. Long-term follow-up is ongoing. These trials were registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT03053440 and #NCT04170283.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.