ArticleBrain : a journal of neurology2026
High-resolution electrophysiological mapping of effective connectivity of lateral prefrontal cortex.
Article in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for preventing chronic postoperative pain in older adults: a randomized clinical sub-study.BMC medicine · 2026Trial
- Stimulation-evoked orbitofrontal activity as a biomarker for DBS personalization in depression.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Obsessive-compulsive disorder and abstract sequence task contributions shift prefrontal cortical connectivity.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Article
- The microstructure-weighted human connectome: network properties and structure-function correlations across spatial scales.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Monosynaptic connections link functionally similar regions in human cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Mapping the human lateral prefrontal cortex at the circuit level.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Effective connectivity of the insula as measured by cortico-cortical evoked potentials.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Non-invasive neuroregulation techniques applied to patients with consciousness disorders: a narrative review.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Review
- Mechanisms of arousal promotion and cortical plasticity induced by multi-target transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with chronic disorders of consciousness.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The lateral prefrontal cortex (LPFC) serves as a critical hub for higher-order cognitive and executive functions in the human brain, coordinating brain networks whose disruption has been implicated in many neurological and psychiatric disorders. While transcranial brain stimulation treatments often target the LPFC, our current understanding of connectivity profiles guiding these interventions based on electrophysiology remains limited. Here, we present a high-resolution probabilistic map of bidirectional effective connectivity between the LPFC and widespread cortical and subcortical regions. This map is derived from intracranial evoked potential analysis of 48 797 intracranial direct electrical stimulation runs across 759 implantations in 724 patients with refractory epilepsy (368 male, 354 female, two unspecified; mean age ± standard deviation: 24 ± 13.5 years). We mapped probabilistic connectivity between brain parcels with adaptive resolution-higher resolution in the LPFC in the hemisphere of interest and lower elsewhere-maintaining statistical power while achieving 95% average confidence interval of ∼0.03 for connectivity probability estimates. In addition, the significance threshold (P-value) for probabilistic connectivity was obtained from surrogate distributions. Overall, we observed remarkable symmetry between afferent and efferent connectivity patterns of the LPFC, with a slight preference for efferent connections (mean slope = 0.92 ± 0.09, mean R2 = 0.93 ± 0.025). For example, connections between the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) and anterior cingulate showed notable directional asymmetry. The IFG strongly projected to most brain networks compared to other LPFC regions, with the strongest connectivity to the ventral attention network (0.26 ± 0.01 compared to values between 0.15 and 0.21 in other LPFC regions). Posterior dorso-lateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) demonstrated stronger connectivity to brain networks compared to anterior DLPFC regions (e.g. 0.21 ± 0.01 versus 0.15 ± 0.01 for connectivity to ventral attention network), with the exception of the limbic cortex. All LPFC subregions strongly projected to the fronto-parietal (greater than 0.17) and ventral attention (greater than 0.15) networks, with moderate connections to the default network (between 0.1 and 0.15, with the maximum corresponding to superior DLPFC). Finally, latency analysis suggested that the left LPFC's influence on ipsilateral emotion-related regions is primarily polysynaptic, with particularly strong pathways from IFG to amygdala (0.16 ± 0.02) and hippocampus (0.12 ± 0.01). Taken together, these comprehensive connectivity maps provide a new detailed electrophysiological foundation for understanding the functional anatomy of LPFC and guiding targeted brain stimulation protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.