Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40924796›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Kinship verification via correlation calculation-based multi-task learning.

Xiaoqian Qin, Dakun Liu, Bin Gui

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xiaoqian QinSchool of Geography and Planning, Huaiyin Normal University, Huai'an, Jiangsu, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5368-8668
Dakun LiuSchool of Mechanical Engineering UGS College, Yancheng Institute of Technology, Yancheng, Jiangsu, China.
Bin GuiSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Huaiyin Normal University, Huai'an, Jiangsu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies have demonstrated that metric learning approaches yield remarkable performance in the field of kinship verification. Nevertheless, a prevalent limitation of most existing methods lies in their over-reliance on learning exclusively from specified types of given kin data, which frequently results in information isolation. Although generative-based metric learning methods present potential solutions to this problem, they are hindered by substantial computational costs. To address these challenges, this paper proposes a novel correlation calculation-based multi-task learning (CCMTL) method specifically designed for kinship verification. It has been observed that kin members often exhibit a high degree of similarity in key facial organs, such as eyes, mouths, and noses. Given this similarity, similar facial features between kin members with different kin relationships frequently demonstrate certain correlations. Inspired by this observation, our proposed method aims to learn a set of metrics by leveraging both the specified kinship data and the correlations among various kinship types. These correlations are determined through an in-depth investigation of the spatial distribution relationship between the specified kinship data and other kinship types. Furthermore, we develop an efficient algorithm within the multi-task learning framework that integrates correlation exploitation with metric learning. This innovative approach effectively resolves the issue of information isolation while minimizing computational overhead. Extensive experimental validation conducted on the KinFaceW dataset demonstrates that the proposed CCMTL method achieves superior or comparable results to those of existing methods.

Indexed as

FamilyLearningMachine LearningAlgorithmsHumans

Identifiers

PMID40924796
PMCPMC12419595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.