Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40924780›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Long sequence temporal knowledge tracing for student performance prediction via integrating LSTM and informer.

Ailian Gao, Zenglei Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ailian GaoSchool of Electrical and Information Engineering, Hunan Institute of Technology, Hengyang, Hunan, China.
Zenglei LiuSchool of Electrical and Information Engineering, Hunan Institute of Technology, Hengyang, Hunan, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2770-4115

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Knowledge tracing can reveal students' level of knowledge in relation to their learning performance. Recently, plenty of machine learning algorithms have been proposed to exploit to implement knowledge tracing and have achieved promising outcomes. However, most of the previous approaches were unable to cope with long sequence time-series prediction, which is more valuable than short sequence prediction that is extensively utilized in current knowledge-tracing studies. In this study, we propose a long-sequence time-series forecasting pipeline for knowledge tracing that leverages both time stamp and exercise sequences. Firstly, we introduce a bidirectional LSTM model to tackle the embeddings of exercise-answering records. Secondly, we incorporate both the students' exercising recordings and the time stamps into a vector for each record. Next, a sequence of vectors is taken as input for the proposed Informer model, which utilizes the probability-sparse self-attention mechanism. Note that the probability sparse self-attention module can address the quadratic computational complexity issue of the canonical encoder-decoder architecture. Finally, we integrate temporal information and individual knowledge states to implement the answers to a sequence of target exercises. To evaluate the performance of the proposed LSTKT model, we conducted comparison experiments with state-of-the-art knowledge tracing algorithms on a publicly available dataset. This model demonstrates quantitative improvements over existing models. In the Assistments2009 dataset, it achieved an accuracy of 78.49% and an AUC of 78.81%. For the Assistments2017 dataset, it reached an accuracy of 74.22% and an AUC of 72.82%. In the EdNet dataset, it attained an accuracy of 68.17% and an AUC of 70.78%.

Indexed as

KnowledgeLearningMachine LearningNeural Networks, ComputerStudentsAlgorithmsHumans

Identifiers

PMID40924780
PMCPMC12419589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.