ArticlePloS one2025
Long sequence temporal knowledge tracing for student performance prediction via integrating LSTM and informer.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Knowledge tracing can reveal students' level of knowledge in relation to their learning performance. Recently, plenty of machine learning algorithms have been proposed to exploit to implement knowledge tracing and have achieved promising outcomes. However, most of the previous approaches were unable to cope with long sequence time-series prediction, which is more valuable than short sequence prediction that is extensively utilized in current knowledge-tracing studies. In this study, we propose a long-sequence time-series forecasting pipeline for knowledge tracing that leverages both time stamp and exercise sequences. Firstly, we introduce a bidirectional LSTM model to tackle the embeddings of exercise-answering records. Secondly, we incorporate both the students' exercising recordings and the time stamps into a vector for each record. Next, a sequence of vectors is taken as input for the proposed Informer model, which utilizes the probability-sparse self-attention mechanism. Note that the probability sparse self-attention module can address the quadratic computational complexity issue of the canonical encoder-decoder architecture. Finally, we integrate temporal information and individual knowledge states to implement the answers to a sequence of target exercises. To evaluate the performance of the proposed LSTKT model, we conducted comparison experiments with state-of-the-art knowledge tracing algorithms on a publicly available dataset. This model demonstrates quantitative improvements over existing models. In the Assistments2009 dataset, it achieved an accuracy of 78.49% and an AUC of 78.81%. For the Assistments2017 dataset, it reached an accuracy of 74.22% and an AUC of 72.82%. In the EdNet dataset, it attained an accuracy of 68.17% and an AUC of 70.78%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.