ArticlePLOS global public health2025
Barriers and facilitators to implementing a single-visit, screen-and-treat approach with thermal ablation for cervical cancer prevention in Kenya.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Implementation science frameworks and strategies to promote adoption of and adherence to oncology clinical practice guidelines in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review.BMC global and public health · 2026Pooled it
- Geographic and demographic patterns of cervical cancer in Africa using GLOBOCAN 2022.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- Screen-and-treat: a sustainable solution for cervical cancer elimination in low and middle income countries.BMJ oncology · 2026Review
- Vaccinating girls, abandoning women: the financing asymmetry between HPV immunization and the cervical cancer treatment cascade in low- and middle-income countries.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cervical cancer continues to be a major global threat to women's health, with approximately 660,000 women diagnosed annually, 94% of whom are in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The high disease burden in LMICs is partly due to suboptimal adoption and widespread implementation of effective preventive interventions. This study explored drivers of implementation success and failure for a future single-visit, screen, and treat approach with thermal ablation (SV-SAT + TA), referred to as TIBA in Kenya. Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR framework), we conducted in-depth interviews with 34 participants (frontline health workers, health facility managers, and policymakers) between May and August 2022 in Kiambu, Embu, and Murang'a Counties in Kenya. All interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. We applied deductive and inductive coding for emerging themes. The participants reported the relative advantage of thermal ablation for the single-visit, screen-and-treat approach, emphasizing its lower start-up and maintenance costs and lower complexity compared to cryotherapy. Additionally, participants expressed confidence in their ability to implement TIBA, and a strong commitment from the leadership to support TIBA implementation was reported. These factors were perceived as drivers of successful TIBA implementation. In contrast, barriers, including lack of essential commodities and equipment, shortage of trained providers, staff redeployment, inadequate space, recruitment challenges, and silos within the healthcare system, were identified as drivers of implementation failure. To optimize cervical cancer prevention efforts in LMICs, it is critical to address both systemic and contextual factors through a coordinated, integrated, and system-wide approach that involves all the key stakeholders.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.