ReviewDeutsches Arzteblatt international2026
Post-Intensive Care Syndrome: From Diagnosis To Treatment.
Review in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients who have been treated in intensive care units (ICUs) display a multitude of physical, cognitive, and/or mental impairments that are collectively called post-intensive care syndrome (PICS). People with PICS have difficulty returning to everyday life.
methodsIn this narrative review, we present epidemiologic data, risk factors, and approaches to the prevention and treatment of PICS, along with the evidence supporting them. Preliminary findings on the prevalence of PICS and the frequency of treatment for it have been obtained at the PICS outpatient clinic at the Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, where patients are evaluated three months after discharge from an ICU along the three domains of PICS: physical function, cognitive performance, and mental health. These findings yield an overall picture of the everyday reality of post-ICU patient care.
resultsKnowledge of the predisposing factors for PICS (sex, old age, pre-existing mental disorders) and of its precipitating factors (stressful experiences in the ICU, severity of illness, delirium), which may change over the course of treatment, enables clinicians to identify patients at risk of PICS and to pursue preventive strategies while they are still being treated in the ICU. Specialized aftercare consists of a wide variety of multidisciplinary treatments whose efficacy remains to be conclusively demonstrated. These include guidance by a physician, patient education, physiotherapy, psychosocial care, and self-help groups. According to the initial findings of the PICS outpatient clinic at the Charité, Campus Virchow Klinikum, 72% (298/417) of patients suffer from impairment in at least one PICS domain three months after discharge from an ICU. The analysis of treatment frequency revealed that half of all patients visited the PICS outpatient clinic in addition to their family physician's practice in at least two three-month periods after their ICU discharge.
conclusionThe specialized, multiprofessional care of patients who have been discharged from an ICU, and of their family members, requires an understanding of the complex pertinent risk factors and courses of illness. It would be desirable for cross-sector care strategies to be established with better integration of rehabilitative services, specialized aftercare facilities, nursing facilities, and primary care practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.