Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40924636›Full record

Observational studyBlood purification2026

Current Status of Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy in Japanese Intensive Care Units: A Multicenter Retrospective Observational Study.

Hidehiko Nakano, Ryota Inokuchi, Yutaro Inoue, Motohiro Sekino, Yasuyuki Kakihana, Noriyuki Hattori, Mariko Miyazaki, Natsuko Tokuhira, Shigeki Fujitani, Yuichiro Toda and 11 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Blood purification, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Hidehiko NakanoDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Ryota InokuchiDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yutaro InoueDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Motohiro SekinoDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.
Yasuyuki KakihanaDepartment of Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima, Japan.
Noriyuki HattoriDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan.
Mariko MiyazakiDepartment of Nephrology, Tohoku University Hospital, Miyagi, Japan.
Natsuko TokuhiraDepartment of Intensive Care, Osaka University Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Shigeki FujitaniDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan.
Yuichiro TodaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, Japan.
Yoshifumi OhchiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Oita, Japan.
Hiroshi MorimatsuDepartment of Anesthesiology and Resuscitology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan.
Shingo IchibaDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshiki MasudaDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Hokkaido, Japan.
Osamu NishidaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Aichi, Japan.
Takaya AbeDepartment of Urology, Iwate Medical University, Iwate, Japan.
Takeshi MoriguchiDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, University of Yamanashi Graduate School of Medicine, Yamanashi, Japan.
Kasumi SatohDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan.
Masafumi IdeiDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Yokohama City University, Kanagawa, Japan.
Hiromasa NagataDepartment of Anesthesiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Kent DoiDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan, kentdoi@m.u-tokyo.ac.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionContinuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is often performed for critically ill patients in intensive care units (ICUs), but its optimal indication and settings have yet to be determined. Thus, we aimed to describe the current status of CRRT in Japan through a multicenter retrospective observational study.

methodsAdult ICU patients receiving CRRT at 18 tertiary hospitals in Japan (up to 100 patients from each hospital over the past year) were retrospectively enrolled. Patients receiving CRRT for <24 h or intermittent renal replacement therapy together with CRRT were excluded. The primary outcomes were the temporal changes in the electrolyte levels, acid-base balance, and uremia-related small solute concentrations. The secondary outcomes included potassium (K) and phosphate (P) supplementations during CRRT.

resultsAltogether, 1,045 patients were enrolled. The median CRRT duration and dose were 4.4 days and 17.3 mL/kg/h, respectively. The electrolyte levels, acid-base balance, and uremia-related small solute concentrations returned to normal by day 4 of treatment. A total of 732 (70.0%) patients received K supplementation, and only a few patients had hypokalemia until day 5. Moreover, 414 (39.6%) patients received P supplementation, and approximately 30%-50% of the patients had hypophosphatemia until day 5.

conclusionThe CRRT dose in Japan was lower than that was recommended by the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes guideline. The electrolyte level abnormalities and acid-base imbalances of the studied patients were improved within 72-96 h of CRRT. Contrarily, K and P supplementations were common, indicating that the current CRRT solutions need to be modified.

Indexed as

Continuous Renal Replacement TherapyIntensive Care UnitsRenal Replacement TherapyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCritical IllnessEast Asian PeopleFemaleHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedPhosphatesPotassiumRetrospective StudiesPhosphatesPotassiumAcute kidney injuryContinuous renal replacement therapyElectrolytesRenal failure

Identifiers

PMID40924636
PMCPMC12795538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.