Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40924420›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Parent and Clinician Perspectives on Diagnostic Testing for Children With Diarrhea: A Qualitative Study.

Anna Jones, Aparna Mangadu, Sarah Dallas, Olivia Hanson, Katherine Arn, Per Gesteland, Julia E Szymczak, Andrew T Pavia, Daniel T Leung, Melissa H Watt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Anna JonesDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City.
Aparna MangaduDivision of Infectious Disease, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City.
Sarah DallasDivision of Infectious Disease, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City.
Olivia HansonDivision of Infectious Disease, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City.
Katherine ArnIntermountain Health, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Per GestelandDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City.
Julia E SzymczakDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City.
Andrew T PaviaDivision of Pediatric Infectious Disease, Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City.
Daniel T LeungDivision of Infectious Disease, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City.
Melissa H WattDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City.

Funding

Utah Stimulating Access to Research in ResidencyR38HL167282 · NHLBI · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI Margaret B Conroy, JOSEPH BARNEY STANFORD · 2023 to 2026
$924k
Mentoring patient-oriented researchers in pediatric diarrheaK24AI166087 · NIAID · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI Daniel Ted Leung · 2023 to 2026
$688k
NHLBI NIH HHS R38 HL167282NIAID NIH HHS K24 AI166087
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Advances in diagnostics have enabled the detection of more gastrointestinal pathogens, but misuse of diagnostics can lead to inappropriate antibiotic use and excess financial burdens. Ensuring appropriate use of diagnostics is crucial for optimizing patient care and promoting stewardship of health care resources. Objective: To elicit parents' and clinicians' perspectives on expectations for care of pediatric diarrhea with a focus on diagnostic testing and to evaluate the potential for an electronic clinical decision support tool (ECDST) to improve appropriate use of diagnostics. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this qualitative study, purposeful sampling was used to recruit parents of children who had sought care for diarrhea and clinicians who care for children with diarrhea from 5 urgent care sites and 1 emergency department in Utah. Recruitment ended after achievement of inductive thematic saturation. Participants were interviewed between June 15, 2023, and January 24, 2025. Main Outcome and Measures: Key themes on expectations for management of pediatric diarrhea and perceptions of an ECDST. Interviews elicited expectations for diagnostic testing and treatment of pediatric diarrhea as well as the perceived utility of an ECDST. Analysis followed an applied thematic analysis framework. Results: Forty-four parents (40 [91%] female; median age, 34 years [range, 21-47 years]) and 16 clinicians (11 [69%] female; median age, 42 years [range, 29-59 years]) were interviewed. Three motivators were identified for parents to seek clinical care for a child with diarrhea: (1) reassurance, (2) understanding the cause of symptoms, and (3) appropriate treatment. Parents viewed diagnostic testing as a tool for meeting these expectations. Clinicians expressed skepticism for the value of diagnostics in informing etiology or treatment but reported that they may order diagnostics to reassure parents. Many clinicians acknowledged the benefits of an ECDST to assist with evidence-based decision-making for diagnostics and facilitate communication with families. Conclusions and Relevance: This qualitative study identified both similarities and tensions between parents and clinicians in expectations for pediatric diarrhea care, especially pertaining to the role of diagnostics. The findings suggest that strategies such as the use of ECDSTs are needed to resolve tension in care expectations, facilitate diagnostic stewardship, and optimize care for pediatric diarrhea.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelDiagnostic Tests, RoutineDiarrheaParentsAdultChildChild, PreschoolDecision Support Systems, ClinicalFemaleHumansInfantMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchUtah

Identifiers

PMID40924420
PMCPMC12421345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.