ArticleJAMA network open2025
Parent and Clinician Perspectives on Diagnostic Testing for Children With Diarrhea: A Qualitative Study.
Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Improving syndromic testing in oncology: performance characteristics of multiplex PCR assays for evaluation of infectious gastroenteritis among hospitalized cancer patients.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Advances in diagnostics have enabled the detection of more gastrointestinal pathogens, but misuse of diagnostics can lead to inappropriate antibiotic use and excess financial burdens. Ensuring appropriate use of diagnostics is crucial for optimizing patient care and promoting stewardship of health care resources. Objective: To elicit parents' and clinicians' perspectives on expectations for care of pediatric diarrhea with a focus on diagnostic testing and to evaluate the potential for an electronic clinical decision support tool (ECDST) to improve appropriate use of diagnostics. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this qualitative study, purposeful sampling was used to recruit parents of children who had sought care for diarrhea and clinicians who care for children with diarrhea from 5 urgent care sites and 1 emergency department in Utah. Recruitment ended after achievement of inductive thematic saturation. Participants were interviewed between June 15, 2023, and January 24, 2025. Main Outcome and Measures: Key themes on expectations for management of pediatric diarrhea and perceptions of an ECDST. Interviews elicited expectations for diagnostic testing and treatment of pediatric diarrhea as well as the perceived utility of an ECDST. Analysis followed an applied thematic analysis framework. Results: Forty-four parents (40 [91%] female; median age, 34 years [range, 21-47 years]) and 16 clinicians (11 [69%] female; median age, 42 years [range, 29-59 years]) were interviewed. Three motivators were identified for parents to seek clinical care for a child with diarrhea: (1) reassurance, (2) understanding the cause of symptoms, and (3) appropriate treatment. Parents viewed diagnostic testing as a tool for meeting these expectations. Clinicians expressed skepticism for the value of diagnostics in informing etiology or treatment but reported that they may order diagnostics to reassure parents. Many clinicians acknowledged the benefits of an ECDST to assist with evidence-based decision-making for diagnostics and facilitate communication with families. Conclusions and Relevance: This qualitative study identified both similarities and tensions between parents and clinicians in expectations for pediatric diarrhea care, especially pertaining to the role of diagnostics. The findings suggest that strategies such as the use of ECDSTs are needed to resolve tension in care expectations, facilitate diagnostic stewardship, and optimize care for pediatric diarrhea.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.