ArticleJAMA network open2025
Abnormal Amyloid-β Duration, Tau, and Neurodegeneration in Cranial Images.
Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: It is unclear whether the duration of amyloid-β (Aβ) pathology is associated with neurodegeneration and whether this depends on the presence of tau. Objective: To examine the association of longitudinal atrophy with Aβ positron emission tomography (PET)-positivity (Aβ+) and the estimated duration of Aβ+ (Aβ+ duration), controlling for tau-positivity. Design, Setting, and Participants: Data for this longitudinal cohort study were drawn from the Wisconsin Registry for Alzheimer Prevention and the Wisconsin Alzheimer Disease Research Center Clinical Core Study. Participants who had 2 or more magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) visits, 1 Pittsburgh compound B (PiB) PET visit, and 1 MK-6240 PET visit with other covariates available were included. A replication analysis was conducted using data from the OASIS-3 dataset. All data were collected between June 1, 2009, and January 22, 2025. Follow-up times ranged from 1.0 to 13.0 years (median [IQR], 8.8 [5.9-10.6] years). Exposures: Sampled iterative local approximation (SILA)-estimated PiB PET uptake at baseline MRI was used to estimate Aβ+ and its duration at baseline MRI. MK-6240 PET uptake in the entorhinal cortex was used to create tau-positive and tau-negative groups using a threshold of 1.27 standardized uptake value ratio. Main Outcomes and Measures: SILA-based modeling of PiB PET data was used to obtain estimated Aβ+ duration at baseline MRI age. Linear mixed-effects models tested differences in atrophy between Aβ+ vs Aβ- individuals and with Aβ+ duration, controlling for individuals who were tau-positive (measured via MK-6240 tau PET) at their most recent PET scan within their MRI visits. Z-scored volumes in temporo-parietal regions of interest associated with AD dementia were assessed via a robust normative approach. Results: A total of 95 Aβ+ (median [IQR] age, 66.4 [61.1-70.4] years; 59 female [62.11%]) and 275 Aβ- (median [IQR] age, 60.2 [55.7-64.6] years; 183 [66.55%] female) individuals were included. Aβ+ (partial η2, 0.015-0.043) and tau-positivity (partial η2, 0.018-0.100) were independently associated with neurodegeneration, with generally small effect sizes. Aβ+ duration was associated with atrophy in a greater number of regions of interest than Aβ+ status alone with somewhat larger effect sizes (partial η2, 0.013-0.056). Results were mostly similar in the OASIS-3 dataset. Conclusions and Relevance: In this longitudinal cohort study, subtle neurodegeneration was observed soon after the onset of Aβ pathology. These results may be consistent with Aβ pathology as a pathological state.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.