ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2025
Parent/caregiver perspectives of meaningful improvement in functional domains for people with CDKL5 deficiency disorder: a mixed-methods study.
Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- The Burden of Epilepsy: The Contribution of Seizures (AES 2025 Presidential Symposium).Epilepsy currents · 2026Article
- Cognitive and behavioral clinical outcome assessments in children with developmental and epileptic encephalopathies: Issues and instruments.Epilepsia · 2026Review
- Trajectory of skill acquisition, loss, and regain in females with classic Rett syndrome.Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders · 2026Article
- Trajectory of skill acquisition, loss, and regain in females with classic Rett syndrome.Research square · 2025Article
- Clinical experience using trofinetide in Rett syndrome and related MECP2 diagnosis at the children's hospital of Philadelphia post approval.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeCDKL5 deficiency disorder (CDD) is a rare developmental and epileptic encephalopathy. Greater understanding of the smallest meaningful improvements for individuals with CDD in clinical trials and practice is needed for a person-centred approach to treatment efficacy. This study explored how parent/caregivers of people with CDD understood meaningful improvements and described change for priority functional domains including communication, gross motor, fine motor, feeding.
methodsThis study included an in-person workshop and a convergent mixed-methods online survey. Parent/caregivers (n = 19) attending the 6th Family Educational and Awareness Conference for CDD participated in discussion groups for the workshop component. The survey (n = 80) collected descriptive data and open-ended responses. Qualitative data were stratified by ability levels and analysed using a conventional content analysis.
resultsDefinitions of meaningful improvement varied in terms of desired speed and magnitude of change and included health and skill stability. Parent/caregivers described meaningful increases in developmental skills that were specific to each domain and level of ability. Some concepts were common across ability levels within domains (e.g., increased independence across all gross motor levels) and others were consistent across domains (e.g., improved utensil use in fine motor and feeding domains).
conclusionMeaningful improvement means different things to different people with some factors consistent regardless of ability level suggesting important underlying concepts for measurement requiring future investigation. These findings can contribute to the development of clinical treatments and trials that focus on factors that are important to people with CDD and their families.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.