ArticleJournal of behavioral medicine2026
Determining the power of a 1-sided z-test given only the power of the corresponding 2-sided test.
Article in Journal of behavioral medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Data analysis for behavioral medicine: an introduction to the special issue.Journal of behavioral medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Estimating statistical power is essential for designing behavioral medicine studies efficiently and conserving finite resources. Sometimes behavioral medicine researchers are interested in calculating power for 1-sided z-tests of individual parameters (e.g., slopes) in complex models such as multilevel structural equation models or multilevel mixture regression models. For such models, calculating power for 1-sided z-tests is cumbersome because: (a) online z-test power calculator tools are inapplicable, (b) commonly-used power analysis software provides power only for 2-sided z-tests and does not allow changing alpha, and (c) published power tables typically provide power results only for 2-sided z-tests. Hence, here we introduce straightforward and resource-efficient conversion formulas to estimate the power of 1-sided z-tests of individual parameters in any model by using direct power conversions from the corresponding 2-sided tests. We then implement these conversion formulas in accessible R and Excel software. This brief report thus provides behavioral medicine researchers with a convenient and practical solution for power calculation that minimizes the time, financial, and computational resources typically needed for power estimation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.