Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40924328›Full record

ReviewJournal of neuro-oncology2025

Photodynamic therapy for glioblastoma: a narrative review.

Gabrielle Price, Stephen C Frederico, Jhair Colan, Frederika Rentzeperis, Sakibul Huq, Constantinos Hadjipanayis

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gabrielle PriceDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, NY, USA.
Stephen C FredericoDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Jhair ColanDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Frederika RentzeperisDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, NY, USA.
Sakibul HuqDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Constantinos HadjipanayisDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. hadjipanayiscg2@upmc.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGlioblastoma (GBM) remains one of the most aggressive primary brain tumors with poor survival outcomes and a lack of approved therapies. A promising novel approach for GBM is the application of photodynamic therapy (PDT), a localized, light-activated treatment using tumor-selective photosensitizers. This narrative review describes the mechanisms, delivery systems, photosensitizers, and available evidence regarding the potential of PDT as a novel therapeutic approach for GBM.

methodsA comprehensive review of the preclinical and clinical literature was conducted on the role of PDT for GBM. Special emphasis was placed on PDT's mechanisms of action, immunomodulatory effects, delivery systems, and combinatorial potential with other treatment regimens. All clinical trials on this topic were reviewed and described.

resultsPDT exerts tumor-specific cytotoxic effects via reactive oxygen species generation, vascular disruption, and immune activation. Photosensitizers such as 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA), chlorins, and phthalocyanines demonstrate selective accumulation in glioma cells and enhance treatment precision. Preclinical studies demonstrate that PDT can induce apoptosis, improve blood-brain barrier permeability, and synergize with existing chemotherapeutics. Early-phase clinical trials, including the INDYGO and talaporfin sodium-based studies, report promising safety profiles and extended survival in newly diagnosed and recurrent GBM patients.

conclusionPDT offers a novel targeted approach for improving local control of GBM. With continued innovation in photosensitizer design, delivery technologies, and combinatorial strategies, PDT holds promise as a viable therapeutic adjunct in GBM treatment. Further clinical validation through randomized controlled trials is warranted to establish its efficacy and gain regulatory approval with the eventual goal of integration into standard neuro-oncology practice.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaPhotochemotherapyPhotosensitizing AgentsAnimalsHumansPhotosensitizing Agents5-ALA, glioblastoma, GBM, talaporfin, photodynamic therapy, PDT

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.