Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40924277›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2026

Target controlled infusion in the intensive care unit: a scoping review.

Michele Introna, Carla Carozzi, Andrea Gentile, Riccarda Girasole, Marco Gemma, Jeroen V Koomen, Michel M R F Struys, Johannes P van Den Berg

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Michele IntronaNeurointensive Care Unit, Department of Neurosurgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy. michele.introna@istituto-besta.it.ORCID 0000-0002-6574-8605
Carla CarozziNeurointensive Care Unit, Department of Neurosurgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6677-1172
Andrea GentileNeurointensive Care Unit, Department of Neurosurgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4494-7020
Riccarda GirasoleSchool of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.
Marco GemmaNeurointensive Care Unit, Department of Neurosurgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9543-3831
Jeroen V KoomenDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7253-3998
Michel M R F StruysDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0421-536X
Johannes P van Den BergDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5624-714X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Target-controlled infusion (TCI) systems, originally developed for intravenous drug administration of anesthetic drugs, enable precise drug delivery based on pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PKPD) models. While widely used in the operating room, their application in the intensive care unit (ICU) remains limited despite the complexity of drug dosing in critically ill patients. This scoping review evaluates existing evidence on the use of TCI systems in ICU settings, focusing on sedation, analgesia, and antibiotic administration. A systematic literature search was conducted in Medline and the Cochrane Library up to August 2024. Studies involving adult ICU patients receiving TCI for any drug were included. Data were extracted on study design, PKPD models, performance metrics, and clinical endpoints. A total of 281 studies were identified; 14 focused on sedatives, particularly propofol and remifentanil, using the Marsh and Minto models. TCI was associated with more stable sedation, improved titration, and fewer adverse events. Evidence on dexmedetomidine and midazolam was limited. Only three studies explored antibiotic TCI, mainly for vancomycin and cefepime, showing potential but lacking robust clinical validation. In conclusion, while current findings are promising, the evidence base supporting TCI-especially in the context of newer, generalized pharmacokinetic models and antibiotics-remains insufficient, and its broader application requires further clinical research and model validation.

Indexed as

Critical CareDrug Delivery SystemsIntensive Care UnitsAnalgesiaAnti-Bacterial AgentsCritical IllnessDexmedetomidineHumansHypnotics and SedativesInfusions, IntravenousPropofolAnti-Bacterial AgentsDexmedetomidineHypnotics and SedativesPropofolClinical pharmacologyCritical careIntensive careSedationTarget controlled infusionTCI

Identifiers

PMID40924277
PMCPMC13053594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.