ArticleMikrochimica acta2025
Titanium dioxide nanoparticles as a promising tool for efficient separation of trace DNA via phosphate-mediated desorption.
Article in Mikrochimica acta, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We systematically evaluated the DNA adsorption and desorption efficiencies of several nanoparticles. Among them, titanium dioxide (TiO₂) nanoparticles (NPs), aluminum oxide (Al₂O₃) NPs, and zinc oxide (ZnO) NPs exhibited strong DNA-binding capacities under mild conditions. However, phosphate-mediated DNA displacement efficiencies varied considerably, with only TiO₂ NPs showing consistently superior performance. Further investigation into the DNA adsorption and desorption mechanisms of TiO₂ NPs led to the following key results: (1) TiO₂ NPs achieved over 98% DNA adsorption at room temperature, but efficient desorption required elevated temperatures; (2) phosphate-induced DNA displacement depended on the full exposure of phosphate groups, and short DNA fragments were insufficient to effectively compete with adsorbed DNA; (3) the adsorption mechanism of TiO₂ NPs involved multiple interactions, such as coordination and hydrogen bonding. The combination of strong coordination and weak ionic forces likely contributed to the high efficiency of phosphate-mediated desorption. Under optimized conditions, TiO₂ NPs demonstrated excellent separation efficiency for structurally complex DNA, with recovery rates of 56.92% for genomic DNA and 66.31% for plasmid DNA, notably higher than those of amino-modified silica-coated magnetic nanoparticles (ASMNPs; 38.66% and 33.59%). These results highlight the potential of TiO₂ NPs as a powerful tool for trace DNA isolation under mild, biocompatible conditions, with promising applications in nucleic acid separation and molecular diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40924267What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.