ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2025
Evolving Cardioprotective Strategies in Cardio-Oncology: A Narrative Review.
Review in Current cardiology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nutritional Prevention of Oxidative Stress-Induced Cardiotoxicity in Pediatric Cardio-Oncology: Molecular Mechanisms and Translational Perspectives-A Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Heart failure induced by cancer therapies: focus on targeted agents, mechanisms, risk prediction, and clinical management.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewPatients living with cancer are at risk for significant potential cardiovascular complications as a direct result of cancer treatment or due to underlying comorbid cardiovascular disease. This article reviews the methods of risk stratification as well as pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic approaches to cardioprotection in cardio-oncology. RECENT
findingsSeveral cancer-specific risk stratification tools have incorporated variables such as age, sex, cancer subtype, traditional cardiovascular risk factors and cancer treatment-related parameters to assess cardiovascular specific risk prior to cancer therapy. Cardioprotective strategies, namely neurohormonal blockade and statins, have yielded mixed results in patients with cancer. Non-pharmacologic strategies, including exercise and dietary interventions, have shown potentially promising results in observational and randomized studies. Ultimately, the optimal cardioprotective strategy should be personalized based on each patient's unique risk profile and clinical context. Further research is needed to better define the role of cardioprotection across different cancer subtypes and cardiovascular risk groups, with an emphasis on refining individualized prevention and treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40924255What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.