ArticleAnimal cognition2025
Can an old rook learn new tricks? Vocal command comprehension and obedience in rooks (Corvus frugilegus).
Article in Animal cognition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Editorial: vocal communication in corvids.Animal cognition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although many animal species are known to learn to respond to human verbal commands, this ability is understudied, as are the cues used to do so. For the best-studied species, the dog, domestication itself is used to justify successful attending to human communicative cues. However, the role of domestication in sensitivity to human cues remains debated. Corvids are songbirds that engage in complex communicative behaviors with conspecifics and with other species. Rooks (Corvus frugilegus) are a cognitively complex, undomesticated corvid shown to possess complex vocal behaviors, and to learn to follow human gaze and pointing cues. Leonidas (Leo), an adult rook, began following verbal commands during unrelated studies, and was tested to confirm his command proficiency and to examine what part(s) of the signal he was using. Leo learned to perform three verbal commands correctly, and was primarily attending to the auditory components of the commands. He showed no evidence of using gaze or any subconscious cues from the experimenter, and though he did initially attend to lip movements, he rapidly overcame their absence. Two additional rooks could only be tested for a shorter duration, but also showed learning of commands, and reached proficiency in some. The ability of this undomesticated non-mammalian species to learn human verbal commands joins existing evidence that neither domestication nor extensive enculturation are strictly necessary for use of heterospecific human cues: instead, some species may be able to co-opt other complex cognitive abilities, possibly the same ones required for their complex communication, to achieve this.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.