ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2025
Transposing intensive care innovation from modern warfare to other resource-limited settings.
Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A novel forward-deployed damage control orthopedics: Battlefield Monitoring and Stabilization (BMS).International journal of burns and trauma · 2026Article
- AI-Driven Innovations in Transfusion Medicine: A Narrative Synthesis of Current Reviews.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDelivering intensive care in conflict zones and other resource-limited settings presents unique clinical, logistical, and ethical challenges. These contexts, characterized by disrupted infrastructure, limited personnel, and prolonged field care, require adapted strategies to ensure critical care delivery under resource-limited settings.
objectiveThis scoping review aims to identify and characterize medical innovations developed or implemented in recent conflicts that may be relevant and transposable to intensive care units operating in other resource-limited settings.
methodsA scoping review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. Five major databases were searched for English-language publications from 2014 to 2025. Studies describing innovations applicable to intensive care in modern warfare or resource-limited settings were included.
resultsWhile many studies relied on experimental or simulated models, a subset described real-world applications in resource-limited environments, including ultrasound-guided regional analgesia, resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta, portable blood transfusion platforms, and artificial intelligence-supported monitoring of traumatic brain injury. Training strategies such as teleconsultation/telementoring and low-cost simulation were also emphasized. Few of these intensive care innovations were validated in real-life wartime conditions.
conclusionInnovations from modern warfare offer pragmatic and potentially transposable solutions for intensive care in resource-limited settings. Successfully adapting them requires validation and contextual adaptation, as well as the implementation of concrete collaborative strategies, including tailored training programs, joint simulation exercises, and structured knowledge translation initiatives, to ensure effective and sustainable integration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40924187What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.