ReviewUrologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025
[New insights from basic research on testicular germ cell tumors and updated tumorigenesis].
Review in Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Type II testicular germ cell tumors (GCT) are the most common malignant disease in young men, with a steadily increasing incidence. They originate from germ cell neoplasia in situ and are classified into seminomas (SE) and nonseminomas (NS). The NS subtype embryonal carcinoma (EC) exhibits stem cell-like characteristics and, thus, has the potential to differentiate into teratomas (TE) or extraembryonic tissues, such as yolk-sac tumors (YST) and choriocarcinomas (CC). Despite the success of cisplatin-based therapy, 10-15% of GCT patients do not (or no longer) respond to this treatment. Possible reasons include the development of cisplatin-induced resistance mechanisms as well as the plasticity of GCT, which can lead to the emergence of rare, therapy-resistant subtypes and, therefore, complicate treatment. In this review article, we present an updated perspective on the current model of GCT development and summarize new molecular insights regarding the emergence of occult/resistant YST populations within SE, the growing teratoma syndrome (GTS), and somatic-type malignancies (STM). These tumor subtypes are characterized by particularly aggressive and treatment-resistant behavior. However, little is currently known about these special GCT forms. Consequently, the heterogeneity and plasticity of these GCT components complicate treatment strategies. Therefore, we also describe promising biomarkers specific for the identification of YST, GTS, and STM to enhance current diagnostic approaches and, in particular, introduce new, alternative, and targeted therapeutic options for resistant YST components.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40924163What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.