Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40924159›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2025

Transient Increased Risk of Shingles Post-Shingrix Vaccination: Self-Controlled Case-Series Analysis.

Aishwarya N Shetty, Daneeta Hennessy, Gonzalo Sepulveda Kattan, Samar Ojaimi, Hazel J Clothier, Jim P Buttery

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aishwarya N ShettyEpidemiology Informatics, Centre for Health Analytics, Melbourne Children's Campus, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9151-049X
Daneeta HennessyEpidemiology Informatics, Centre for Health Analytics, Melbourne Children's Campus, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2384-6618
Gonzalo Sepulveda KattanEpidemiology Informatics, Centre for Health Analytics, Melbourne Children's Campus, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Samar OjaimiMonash Pathology, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Hazel J ClothierEpidemiology Informatics, Centre for Health Analytics, Melbourne Children's Campus, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7594-0361
Jim P ButteryEpidemiology Informatics, Centre for Health Analytics, Melbourne Children's Campus, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9905-2035

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFollowing the introduction of a funded recombinant shingles vaccine (RZV; Shingrix, GlaxoSmithKline) vaccination program in adults aged ≥65 years in Australia, clinician reports of shingles presentations shortly after vaccination emerged. We investigated whether there was an increase in shingles risk immediately post-RZV vaccination in southeastern Australia.

methodsTwo independent datasets-a general practice dataset and a statewide linked dataset-were analyzed separately using self-controlled case series (SCCS) analyses with 21 days postvaccination as the risk window. The observation period was 1 January 2023 to 30 April 2025. Adults ≥18 years were included, with analyses stratified by age (<65 and ≥65 years) and sex. We calculated the rate of incident shingles in time periods relative to vaccination, along with attributable risk and the risk of postherpetic neuralgia (PHN).

resultsThe primary care SCCS analysis found an 11-fold increase (relative incidence, 10.96; 95% CI, 10.34-11.62; P < .0001) in shingles presentations within 21 days post-dose 1 of RZV vaccination in adults ≥65 in the general practice dataset only. No increase was detected in younger adults. Following dose 2, the risk of shingles presentations was reduced in all age groups. Vaccine recipients had a 73% reduction in shingles following 2 doses. PHN risk was not increased.

conclusionsThere is a transient increase in shingles presentations shortly after dose 1 of RZV vaccination in adults ≥65 years; however, these cases are likely to be mild and there is clear evidence of vaccine effectiveness after the completion of 2 doses.

Indexed as

Herpes ZosterHerpes Zoster VaccineVaccinationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAustraliaFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedNeuralgia, PostherpeticYoung AdultHerpes Zoster Vaccineimmunizationreal-world evidenceshinglesvaccine safetyzoster reactivation

Identifiers

PMID40924159
PMCPMC12728290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.