ReviewClinical neuroradiology2026
Intracranial Rescue Stenting in Pediatric Focal Cerebral Arteriopathy.
Review in Clinical neuroradiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPediatric acute ischemic stroke is a rare yet severe condition with multifactorial etiology, often associated with vasculopathies. Endovascular intervention in children with focal cerebral arteriopathy is seldom reported. PURPOSE: Our aim was to report feasibility of intracranial rescue stenting for the management of pediatric focal cerebral arteriopathy with flow-limiting stenosis.
methodsWe report a toddler with acute ischemic stroke due to flow-limiting focal cerebral arteriopathy of the left middle cerebral artery, treated with intracranial stenting. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus to identify case reports and series involving pediatric patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with intracranial stenting. Six cases met inclusion criteria. Extracted data included demographics (age, sex), clinical presentation, time of onset, medical history, occlusion location and etiology, stent type, pre- and post-stent NIHSS scores, antiplatelet therapy, and clinical outcomes at follow-up.
resultsA total of six pediatric acute ischemic stroke cases with intracranial stent deployment in the acute stage were analyzed. The supraclinoid internal carotid artery was the most common site of stent deployment (4/6), while intracranial dissection was the most frequent cause of vessel occlusion (3/6). All included patients achieved resolution of the initial neurological deficit on follow-up (range: 6 weeks to 6 months). Variation in the use of intraoperative and postoperative antiplatelet regimens was observed.
conclusionsThis case demonstrates off-label rescue stenting in pediatric acute ischemic stroke due to focal cerebral arteriopathy, emphasizing the importance of individualized multidisciplinary management in this rare setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.