Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40924083›Full record

ArticleChirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025

[Biliodigestive anastomosis: technique and outcome].

Maximilian Brunner, Robert Grützmann

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Maximilian BrunnerKlink für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum der Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen, Erlangen, Deutschland. Maximilian.Brunner@uk-erlangen.de.
Robert GrützmannKlink für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum der Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen, Erlangen, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The biliodigestive anastomosis represents a core element of hepatopancreatobiliary surgery. It requires a precise surgical technique and detailed knowledge of biliary anatomy and vascular supply. A tension-free suture, sufficient perfusion of the anastomosed structures and an exact mucosa-to-mucosa adaptation using delicate absorbable suture material are decisive for a successful construction. Hepaticojejunostomy has become established as the gold standard for a biliodigestive anastomosis. Currently available studies show no significant differences in morbidity between open and minimally invasive techniques, whereby the latter is becoming increasingly more important. There was also no difference in the clinical results with respect to the suture technique (interrupted vs. continuous suture); however, the continuous suture technique is associated with a shortening of the placement time and a reduction in costs. Complications after biliodigestive anastomosis, such as insufficiency and stenosis, are clinically relevant and substantially influence the morbidity and mortality; however, many of these complications can nowadays be effectively treated by interventional procedures.

Indexed as

Biliary Tract Surgical ProceduresAnastomosis, SurgicalBiliary TractHumansPostoperative ComplicationsSuture TechniquesTreatment OutcomeHepaticojejunostomyHepatopancreatobiliary surgeryInsufficiencyStenosisSuture technique

Identifiers

PMID40924083
PMCPMC12552367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.