ArticleSystematic biology2026
Estimating Waiting Distances between Genealogy Changes under a Multi-Species Extension of the Sequentially Markov Coalescent.
Article in Systematic biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Not Just Ne Ne-More: New Applications for SMC from Ecology to Phylogenies.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Review
- The Length of Haplotype Blocks and Signals of Structural Variation in Reconstructed Genealogies.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
- Detecting introgression from phylogenetic invariant site patterns using machine learning.Applications in plant sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genomes are composed of a mosaic of segments inherited from different ancestors, each separated by past recombination events. Consequently, genealogical relationships among multiple genomes vary spatially across different genomic regions. Genealogical variation among unlinked (uncorrelated) genomic regions is well described for either a single population (coalescent) or multiple structured populations (multispecies coalescent). However, the expected similarity among genealogies at linked regions of a genome is less well characterized. Recently, an analytical solution was derived for the distribution of the waiting distance for a change in the genealogical tree spatially across a genome for a single population with constant effective population size. Here, we describe a generalization of this result in terms of the distribution of waiting distances between changes in genealogical trees and topologies for multiple structured populations with branch-specific effective population sizes (i.e., under the multispecies coalescent). We implemented our model in the Python package ipcoal and validated its accuracy against stochastic coalescent simulations. Using a novel likelihood framework, we show that tree and topology-change waiting distances in an ancestral recombination graph can be used to fit species tree model parameters, demonstrating an application of our model for developing new methods for phylogenetic inference. The multi-species sequentially Markov coalescent model presented here represents a major advance for linking local ancestry inference to hierarchical demographic models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.