Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40923974›Full record

ArticleJournal of community psychology2025

Community Connection and Loneliness in Canada.

Kristi Baerg MacDonald, Julie Aitken Schermer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Community Connection and Loneliness in Canada.Journal of community psychology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kristi Baerg MacDonaldDepartment of Psychology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2967-9761
Julie Aitken SchermerDepartment of Psychology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3469-7710

Funding

K.B.M. is supported in part by funding from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine how loneliness relates to community size, participation and attitudes. We conducted two studies using three large-scale Canadian datasets (total N = 20,071). Community size was determined by census postal code areas, and loneliness, community participation and attitudes were evaluated by self-report ratings. In each cross-sectional study, we use correlations, multiple regression and one-way ANOVA analyses to evaluate the relationship of loneliness to urban-rural communities, group participation and ratings of connection and belongingness. In both studies, lower loneliness was predicted by higher feelings of connection in one's community. People who participated in groups were also less lonely, but the relationship was weak. Only Study 2 results showed a pattern of relationship between loneliness and urban/rural categories; participants living in urban communities identified higher loneliness. Attitudes about community connection are important predictors of loneliness where more physical variables of participation and size have a much smaller relationship. Measurement limitations and community characteristics are discussed.

Indexed as

LonelinessNeighborhood CharacteristicsResidence CharacteristicsAdolescentAdultAgedAttitudeCanadaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRural PopulationUrban PopulationYoung AdultbelongingCanadacommunity involvementlonelinesspopulation density

Identifiers

PMID40923974
PMCPMC12419236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.