ArticleEpigenomics2025
Blood-based DNA methylation markers for autism spectrum disorder identification using machine learning.
Article in Epigenomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Critical Synthesis of Machine Learning in Autism Spectrum Disorder Genomic Research: From Transcriptomics to Microbiome.Medeniyet medical journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAutism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a complex neurodevelopmental disorder lacking objective biomarkers for early diagnosis. DNA methylation is a promising epigenetic marker, and machine learning offers a data-driven classification approach. However, few studies have examined whole-blood, genome-wide DNA methylation profiles for ASD diagnosis in school-aged children.
methodsWe analyzed genome-wide DNA methylation data from GEO dataset GSE113967, including 52 children with ASD and 48 typically developing (TD) controls. Differentially methylated positions (DMPs) were identified, and feature selection was performed using support vector machine-recursive feature elimination with cross-validation (SVM-RFECV). Classification models were developed using random forest (RF), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and decision tree (DT) classifiers. A nomogram visualized feature contributions.
resultsA total of 138 DMPs differentiated ASD from TD children. Eleven CpG sites selected by SVM-RFECV formed the basis for model construction. RF and XGBoost achieved the highest accuracy (75%), with DT reaching 70%. Functional annotation indicated enrichment in cell adhesion and immune-related pathways.
conclusionsThis exploratory study demonstrates the feasibility of integrating peripheral blood DNA methylation data with machine learning to distinguish children with ASD. While limited by sample size and moderate accuracy, this study provides methodological insights into the feasibility of integrating epigenetic and computational approaches for ASD-related biomarker exploration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.