Trial reportJournal of cosmetic dermatology2025
Randomized Clinical Trial on the Efficacy of Oral Tranexamic Acid Versus Topical Tranexamic Acid in Treatment of Melasma.
Trial report in Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Randomized Clinical Trial on the Efficacy of Oral Tranexamic Acid Versus Topical Tranexamic Acid in Treatment of Melasma.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2025Trial
- Innovations in Refractory Melasma: Mechanism-Based Management and Emerging Therapeutic Strategies.Cureus · 2026Review
- Correction to "Randomized Clinical Trial on the Efficacy of Oral Tranexamic Acid Versus Topical Tranexamic Acid in Treatment of Melasma".Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMelasma is a prevalent skin condition that primarily affects females of reproductive age. Despite the various available treatments, managing melasma is challenging due to frequent relapses and partial responses. Tranexamic acid (TXA) has gained attention as a potential treatment because of its antifibrinolytic and anti-melanogenic properties. However, there is still limited information on the efficacy of oral versus topical TXA formulations.
aimThe present investigation explored the efficacy and safety of topical versus oral TXA in melasma patients to determine whether topical administration could provide a viable alternative with improved tolerability. PATIENTS/
methodsIn this single-center randomized trial, 50 melasma patients received oral TXA (250 mg twice daily) or topical TXA (a 5% cream applied twice daily) for 12 weeks. Melasma severity was measured using the Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI) score at baseline and after 3 months. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 24, with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant.
resultsFifty female patients (mean age≈39.9 years) were equally randomized to the oral and topical TXA group. One patient in the topical group discontinued treatment due to sensitivity, while all in the oral group completed the study. At baseline, MASI scores were not significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.28). After 12 weeks, both groups demonstrated significant reductions in MASI scores (oral group: 58.86%; topical group: 50.88%; p = 0.001 for each), though the difference was insignificant. DISCUSSION: Fifty female patients (mean age≈39.9 years) were equally randomized to the oral and topical TXA groups. One patient in the topical group discontinued treatment due to sensitivity, while all in the oral group completed the study. Baseline MASI scores were similar (p = 0.28). After 12 weeks, both groups demonstrated significant reductions in MASI scores (oral group: 58.86%; topical group: 50.88%; p = 0.001 for each), though the difference was not statistically significant.
conclusionBoth forms of TXA are effective with low side effects. The choice between oral and topical TXA can depend on patient preference and convenience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.