ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2025
Reducing unintended valgus deformity after supracondylar femoral derotational osteotomy: Influence of derotation amount and osteotomy method based on femoral antecurvature.
Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reducing unintended valgus deformity after supracondylar femoral derotational osteotomy: Influence of derotation amount and osteotomy method based on femoral antecurvature.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe purposes of this study were threefold: (1) to evaluate the influence of femoral antecurvature on coronal alignment changes following supracondylar femoral derotational osteotomy (FDO); (2) to investigate the combined effects of derotation angle and osteotomy orientation in relation to femoral antecurvature and (3) to propose a practical strategy for minimising valgus deviation after FDO based sagittal femoral bowing. MATERIALS AND
methodsSixty-six cadaveric femoral computed tomography (CT) scans were analysed using three-dimensional (3D) simulation. Femurs were classified into three groups based on the degree of antecurvature using the distal diaphyseal angle (DDA). Virtual surgery was simulated at 7 cm above the joint line using two osteotomy methods (shaft-perpendicular and distal femur condylar line [DFC]-parallel) and two derotation angles (10° and 20°). Mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA) was measured before and after simulation. Multivariable and stratified regression analyses were performed.
resultsGreater antecurvature led to larger mLDFA decrease, with more pronounced valgus shifts at higher derotation angles. Making DFC-parallel osteotomy significantly reduced valgus change regardless of bowing (β = -0.331, p = 0.005). A significant interaction was found between DDA and derotation angle (β = 0.015, p < 0.001). The combination of DFC-parallel osteotomy with 10° derotation provided the least valgus change (R² = 0.84). The allowable derotation angle to maintain <1° valgus shift decreased as DDA increased.
conclusionFemoral antecurvature significantly affects coronal alignment after supracondylar FDO. Although the optimal target angle for derotation remains a surgical choice, understanding the relationship between sagittal bowing and coronal alignment can help tailor patient-specific decisions. To minimise valgus shift after supracondylar FDO, aligning the osteotomy plane parallel to the distal femur condylar line can be effective. This method is simple and practical for standard surgical procedures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.